1972
DOI: 10.1039/c39720001294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoreduction of iron(III) chloride in aqueous media

Abstract: A study of the photoreduction of iron(II1) to iron(I1) in aqueous iron(m) chloride as a function of hydrochloric acid and chloride ion concentrations indicates that Fe3fOH-, and not Fe3+Cl-, is the photoactive species.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 10 shows the transient absorption spectra after the laser pulse of the ternary system XYL/H2O2/FeCl3. This is indicative of H2O2 competing with the Clanion and XYL for the Cl • available in the solution (see eq 20). The main difference between the spectra reported in Figures 9 and 10 is the significantly lower intensity of the 420-nm band in the last case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Figure 10 shows the transient absorption spectra after the laser pulse of the ternary system XYL/H2O2/FeCl3. This is indicative of H2O2 competing with the Clanion and XYL for the Cl • available in the solution (see eq 20). The main difference between the spectra reported in Figures 9 and 10 is the significantly lower intensity of the 420-nm band in the last case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In another area, there are also serious outstanding ambiguities connected with the nature of the absorbing species responsible for photoreactions. A recent communication (4) in which Fe(I1) yields were examined as a function of p H and chloride ion concentration concluded that reaction followed on absorption by Fe(OH2),-OH2+ but not Fe(OH2),C12+. Since polymerization initiated in chloride-containing solutions produces polymers with both -C1 and -OH terminal groups, there is reason to consider both Can.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the FeCl 3 solution n D was found to be 1.355, whilst the refractive index of the FeCl 2 solution amounted to n D = 1.338. Therefore it is concluded that the refractive index change of PVA:FeCl 3 as a result of UV irradiation is caused by the change of the oxidation state of the iron ions 5, 20. As the wavelength for measuring the refractive index (λ = 589 nm) is outside the optical absorbance of Fe +3 , anomalous dispersion can be ruled out in this case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%