2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2005.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photosynthesis of cryptobiotic soil crusts in a seasonally inundated system of pans and dunes in the western Mojave Desert, CA: Field studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these result in various ecophysiological responses which could derive directly from the different adaptation strategy of the two crusts. Previous studies [29,30] reported a similar tendency of the CO 2 assimilation rate of different ecological characteristics of cryptogamic crusts although the authors did not investigate the ability of the layers to tolerate the desiccation and these samples were collected from completely different climatic conditions compared to our samples. Various crusts species have typical responses to environmental factors resulting in different C gain under the same environmental conditions that were also reflected in our results.…”
Section: Net Co 2 Assimilation Responsesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of these result in various ecophysiological responses which could derive directly from the different adaptation strategy of the two crusts. Previous studies [29,30] reported a similar tendency of the CO 2 assimilation rate of different ecological characteristics of cryptogamic crusts although the authors did not investigate the ability of the layers to tolerate the desiccation and these samples were collected from completely different climatic conditions compared to our samples. Various crusts species have typical responses to environmental factors resulting in different C gain under the same environmental conditions that were also reflected in our results.…”
Section: Net Co 2 Assimilation Responsesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Despite their importance only a few studies are interested in the ecophysiology of cyanobacterial crust communities of the tropical and subtropical inselberg rock surfaces [7,9,19,21,[26][27][28] and seasonally inundated system of plans and dunes [29,30]. Most studies deal with the photosynthesis of the cryptogamic crusts under laboratory conditions [29] while only few characterize the photosynthesis of free-living cyanobacteria under natural conditions in the tropical field [7,21,28,31] and desert [11,13,30]. In addition, as BSCs dry out more slowly due to their embedment to the rock or soil surfaces (under their natural habitats) and therefore may retain water longer than lichens and mosses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global estimate of net carbon uptake by lichens and bryophytes amounts to 0.34 (Gt C) yr −1 for the averageweighting method and 3.3 (Gt C) yr −1 for the maximum- (Oechel and Collins, 1976) Tundra 38.5-171 (2) (Schuur et al, 2007) Tundra 12-60 (3) (Shaver and Chapin III, 1991) Tundra 2-68 (4) (Uchida et al, 2006) Tundra 1.9 (Uchida et al, 2002) Tundra 6.5 (Billings, 1987) Boreal forest 9.7-78 (2) (Bisbee et al, 2001) Boreal forest 25 (Camill et al, 2001) Boreal forest 9.2-75.9 (8) (Gower et al, 1997) Boreal forest 12 (Grigal, 1985) Boreal forest 128-152 (2) (Harden et al, 1997) Boreal forest 60-280 (3) (Bond-Lamberty et al, 2004) Boreal forest 0-297.1 (14) Boreal forest 0.4-16.2 (7) (Oechel and Van Cleve, 1986) Boreal forest 40-44 (2) (Reader and Stewart, 1972) Boreal forest 14.4 (Ruess et al, 2003) Boreal forest 29.2-31.2 (2) (Swanson and Flanagan, 2001) Boreal forest 104 (Szumigalski and Bayley, 1996) Boreal forest 15.2-81.2 (10) (Thormann, 1995) Boreal forest 23.2-73.2 (3) Boreal forest 12-32 (9) (Wieder and Lang, 1983) Boreal forest 216-316 (3) (Brostoff et al, 2005) Desert 11.7 (Garcia-Pichel and Belnap, 1996) Desert 0.54 (Jeffries et al, 1993) Desert 0.07-1.5 (3) (Klopatek, 1992) Desert 5.3-29 (4) (Clark et al, 1998) Tropical forest 37-64 (2) weighting method (for a description of these weighting methods see Sect. 2.3).…”
Section: Modelled Net Carbon Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these results, two biocrust groups can be distinguished: one where biocrusts experienced net C uptake and the other where biocrusts experienced C loss. Examples from the net C uptake group include a biocrust from the Mojave Desert which gained 11.7 g C m −2 yr −1 (Brostoff et al, 2005), a biocrust in the northern Negev Desert, Israel, with a net C uptake of 0.7-5.1 g m −2 yr −1 (Wilske et al, 2008(Wilske et al, , 2009) and a biocrust from a desert region of north-west China showing a net C uptake of 3.5 to 6.1 g C m −2 yr −1 (Feng et al, 2014). Among the C-losing biocrusts are those of southeast Utah determined to be typical net C sources (Bowling et al, 2011), a biocrust from the Colorado Plateau, USA, also losing 62 ± 8 g C m −2 yr −1 (Darrouzet-Nardi et al, 2015) and finally biocrusts from the Gurbantunggut Desert, north-western China, showed a C release of 48.8 ± 5.4 to 50.9 ± 3.8 g m −2 yr −1 (Su et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%