2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11099-016-0239-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photosynthetic acclimation and leaf traits of Stipa bungeana in response to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> under five different watering conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, both of the caespitose and rhizomatous grasses have the similar tiller longevity and bud bank densities, but their growth forms differ in number, distribution, and branch of leaves and tillers (N'Guessan, ; Ott, ). Moreover, photosynthetic characteristics and leaf traits of caespitose grasses differ from rhizomatous grasses (Lulli et al., ; Wang, Zhou, Jiang, Shi, & Xu, ). These different plant traits may result in various response mechanisms between the two grass types to defoliation and water stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, both of the caespitose and rhizomatous grasses have the similar tiller longevity and bud bank densities, but their growth forms differ in number, distribution, and branch of leaves and tillers (N'Guessan, ; Ott, ). Moreover, photosynthetic characteristics and leaf traits of caespitose grasses differ from rhizomatous grasses (Lulli et al., ; Wang, Zhou, Jiang, Shi, & Xu, ). These different plant traits may result in various response mechanisms between the two grass types to defoliation and water stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, photosynthetic characteristics and leaf traits of caespitose grasses differ from rhizomatous grasses (Lulli et al, 2011;Wang, Zhou, Jiang, Shi, & Xu, 2017). These different plant traits may result in various response mechanisms between the two grass types to defoliation and water stress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, high levels of photosynthesis were sustained under high CO2 concentrations only when other environmental conditions permitted continuous rapid growth (Yilmaz et al 2017) or when plant carbohydratestorage capacity was extensive (Aranjuelo et al 2011), whereas photosynthesis was downregulated when sink activity was limited (Thomas andStrain 1991, Aranjuelo et al 2005). Significant limitations of plant sink activity, and photosynthetic downregulation, can be imposed by various conditions on their own or in combination (Demmig- Adams et al 2017, such as a low supply of nutrients or water (Porras et al 2017, Wang et al 2017, Tausz-Posch et al 2020, restricted root expansion (Andrade et al 1993, Poorter et al 2012, or genetic constraints to either fast growth (Poorter et al 1990) or efficient nitrogen uptake and utilization (Adavi and Sathee 2021a, Padhan et al 2020). Photosynthetic downregulation is a result of a series of regulatory events, where carbohydrate build-up feeds back into the photosynthetic electron transport chain (Fig.…”
Section: Literature Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction in biomass and photosynthetic rate under water deficiency may be due to stomatal limitation or non-stomatal limitation (Yu et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2017). The former is typically caused by stomatal number, stomatal distribution pattern, and stomatal opening (Fan et al, 2020;Zheng et al, 2020), while the latter is attributed to metabolic disorders such as imbalance of carbon sink and source or reduced carboxylation efficiency due to reduced Rubisco activity (Parry et al, 2003;Aranjuelo et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%