2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-022-01164-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photosynthetically Active Radiation, Attenuation Coefficient, Depth of the Euphotic Zone, and Water Turbidity in the Neva Estuary: Relationship with Environmental Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common lapse in phytoplankton studies is the characterization of light availability for phytoplankton using, besides the light attenuation coefficient, the compensation depth that corresponds to the bottom of the euphotic zone and is defined as the depth where the intensity of photosynthetically active radiation is 1% of incident PAR. Given that this amount of PAR is sufficient to sustain photosynthesis, the compensation depth is another metric widely used in phytoplankton research (e.g., [31]). However, the euphotic layer and the mixed layer are usually neither coincident nor proportional, and whilst the euphotic depth depends on inherent optical properties of the water, the mixing depth is mainly affected by physical-meteorological forcing, bathymetry, and even tides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common lapse in phytoplankton studies is the characterization of light availability for phytoplankton using, besides the light attenuation coefficient, the compensation depth that corresponds to the bottom of the euphotic zone and is defined as the depth where the intensity of photosynthetically active radiation is 1% of incident PAR. Given that this amount of PAR is sufficient to sustain photosynthesis, the compensation depth is another metric widely used in phytoplankton research (e.g., [31]). However, the euphotic layer and the mixed layer are usually neither coincident nor proportional, and whilst the euphotic depth depends on inherent optical properties of the water, the mixing depth is mainly affected by physical-meteorological forcing, bathymetry, and even tides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to high concentrations of phytoplankton, water transparency is often reduced by suspended matter [2]. For example, in the upper part of the Neva Estuary, with an average depth of 5 m, the concentration of suspended mineral matter explained 91% of the turbidity variance [10]. In the Sestroretsky Razliv reservoir, the TSS concentration also reveals a negative relationship with D sd (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is evidence that under high turbidity conditions, the Secchi disk can provide incorrect data, such as about the depth of the euphotic zone [25]. This can be especially pronounced at high concentrations of colored dissolved organic matter in the water, as shown, for instance, in the case of the Neva River estuary [10]. Although CDOM did not have a direct pronounced effect on Secchi disk depth in the Sestroretskiy Razliv reservoir (Figure 4), high CDOM concentrations, as an additional factor, can disrupt the contrast of the white disk and yield incorrect water transparency values [10,25] because photons reflected from the Secchi disk can be absorbed strongly by the CDOM on their way back to the water surface [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation