2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2001.00201-6.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phototype and chromotype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Volunteers were excluded from the study if they had sunlight exposure to their back in the preceding 4 weeks or during the study, if they took non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (three subjects) or steroids during the study, had a history of photosensitivity or were taking photosensitizing medications or if they had Fitzpatrick skin type V or VI. Skin types V and VI make it difficult to discern erythema from constitutive pigmentation when visually reading the MED (19, 20). Another three subjects were excluded because a simultaneous MED could not be determined for ssUV and either 290 or 310 nm UV, leaving 139 subjects who were included in the analysis (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volunteers were excluded from the study if they had sunlight exposure to their back in the preceding 4 weeks or during the study, if they took non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (three subjects) or steroids during the study, had a history of photosensitivity or were taking photosensitizing medications or if they had Fitzpatrick skin type V or VI. Skin types V and VI make it difficult to discern erythema from constitutive pigmentation when visually reading the MED (19, 20). Another three subjects were excluded because a simultaneous MED could not be determined for ssUV and either 290 or 310 nm UV, leaving 139 subjects who were included in the analysis (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%