2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photovoltaic model parameters identification using Northern Goshawk Optimization algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The irradiance was measured using an SP‐110‐SS silicon‐cell pyranometer. A high‐probe infrared electronic thermometer temperature gauge with a 1‐C precision is used to measure the temperature [65].…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The irradiance was measured using an SP‐110‐SS silicon‐cell pyranometer. A high‐probe infrared electronic thermometer temperature gauge with a 1‐C precision is used to measure the temperature [65].…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The irradiance was measured using an SP-110-SS silicon-cell pyranometer. A high-probe infrared electronic thermometer temperature gauge with a 1-C precision is used to measure the temperature [65]. The KC200GT PV module's nine parameters are extracted using the INFO optimizer, and it exhibits superior convergence properties compared with the algorithm listed in Table 3 as its fitness function reaches 9.0738 × 10 −06 .…”
Section: Kyocera-kc200gtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DDM best result is 2.404 × 10 −3 provided by Coyote Optimization Algorithm (COA) [37]. The best result of the TDM is provided by the Northern Goshawk Optimization (NGO) [34] with a final fitness of 1.346 × 10 −5 .…”
Section: Photovoltaic Parameters Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar study has been proposed in [32] using Atomic Orbital Search (AOS), and another one in [33] by using the Marine Predators Optimizer (MPA). Kyocera KC200GT PV also recieved increased interest in the parameters identification context, such as Northern Goshawk Optimization (NGO) [34], Gorilla Troops Optimizer (GTO) [35], Transient Search Optimization (TSO) [36], and Coyote Optimization Algorithm (COA) [37]. On the other hand, papers that present battery parameter extraction strategies are more frequently published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection, the supremacy of the hybrid GTO-GBO technique is demonstrated using 23 benchmark iterations considered for all applied techniques is 200 and the number of populations is 50. In this subsection, the hybrid GTO-GBO algorithm is compared with several recent algo-rithms such as conventional GTO, GBO, artificial rabbits optimization (ARO) [54], and northern goshawk optimization (NGO) [55], [56] and the superiority of the achieved solution is tested using mean value and standard deviation (std functions in terms of the average value (F1, F3, F5, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11, F13, F14, F16, F17, F19, F21, F22, F23). It is clear from these results that the GTO-GBO algorithm can attain better solutions compared to several newly proposed algorithms in solving numerous of the benchmark functions.…”
Section: A Benchmark Functions Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%