2022
DOI: 10.1002/appl.202200077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photovoltaic performance of mixed cation K0.005MA0.995PbI3‐based perovskite solar module

Abstract: Hybrid halide perovskites (HHPs) are attracting large attention due to their excellent photovoltaic characteristics. MAPbI3 (MA = CH3NH3) based solar cells are widely studied both on experimental and theoretical fronts. Alkali metal ion doping in the absorbing layer material (MAPbI3) of HHP solar cells is helpful for enhancing the photovoltaic performance and stability of the complete solar module. In present work, a complete perovskite solar module with K‐doped MAPbI3 absorbing layer has been simulated numeri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical simulation is a significant and vital tool for predicting solar cell performance and providing practical direction for optimizing different geometrical and technical aspects of solar cells. [ 66–71 ] The simulation can demonstrate the physical action, and the feasibility of a specified physical model, and is a useful way to examine how device parameters impact the physical operation and device performance without having to wait long. Throughout the field of photovoltaics, numerous simulation models are being used like AMPS, COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS, GPVDM, SCAPS‐1D, SETFOS, SILVACO, and TCAD.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Pscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical simulation is a significant and vital tool for predicting solar cell performance and providing practical direction for optimizing different geometrical and technical aspects of solar cells. [ 66–71 ] The simulation can demonstrate the physical action, and the feasibility of a specified physical model, and is a useful way to examine how device parameters impact the physical operation and device performance without having to wait long. Throughout the field of photovoltaics, numerous simulation models are being used like AMPS, COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS, GPVDM, SCAPS‐1D, SETFOS, SILVACO, and TCAD.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Pscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Device performance is highly influenced by a variety of parameters such as device architecture, compositional engineering, and film production process. [ 28–31 ] Importantly, PSC's efficiency is generally dependent on the materials utilized in the various layers as well as the film deposition technique employed. [ 32–36 ] The description of some important techniques for the thin film deposition of PSCs such as solutions‐based processing methods like spin coating and dip coating, and roll‐to‐roll printing methods, with a focus on the parameters affecting the quality and the thickness of the coated thin films on the substrate are as follows:…”
Section: Synthesis Of Pscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we introduced various ETLs such as SnO 2 , TiO 2 , La-doped BaSnO 3 (LBSO), Indium gallium zinc oxide (IGZO) and Graphene oxide (GO), and various HTLs such as Spiro-OMeTAD, P3HT, Cu 2 O, CuI, CBTS, CFTS and CuSbS 2 in the pristine heterostructure (FTO/ETL/(GA/FA/Cs)PbI 3 /HTL/Au) in order to attain the configuration with best PV performance. The input simulation parameters for these materials were extracted from previous literature reports [21,23,[27][28][29] as presented in SI Table S1. Concurrently, a thickness of 40 nm and a bulk defect density of 1 × 10 15 cm À 3 are taken into consideration for the scrutiny of the proposed ETLs in the PSC.…”
Section: Optimization and Effect Of Etlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the basic input parameters for various materials used in the present simulation work were extracted from the existing literature [13,[21][22][23][24][25][26] and are summarized in Supplementary Information (SI) Table S1. At 300 K, the simulated device was exposed to standard AM 1.5 G (100 mW cm À 2 ) solar spectrum.…”
Section: Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%