Phrasal Names in Polish: A+N, N+A and N+N Units

Cetnarowska, Bożena

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74394-3_11

Cited by 24 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…From a usage-based perspective, this is a better analysis as the schema can be extracted from actually existing forms. Similar conclusions have been drawn for the so-called (para)synthetic compounds combining compounding and affixation (Gaeta & Zeldes 2017;Cetnarowska 2018Cetnarowska , 2020Masini & Iacobini 2018;Gaeta & Angster 2019).…”

Section: Li08ch03_audringsupporting

confidence: 73%

Advances in Morphological Theory: Construction Morphology and Relational Morphology

Audring

2022

Annu. Rev. Linguist.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, construction-based approaches to morphology have gained ground in the research community. This framework is characterized by the assumption that the mental lexicon is extensive and richly structured, containing not only a large number of stored words but also a wide variety of generalizations in the form of schemas. This review explores two construction-based theories, Construction Morphology and Relational Morphology. After outlining the basic theoretical architecture, the article presents an array of recent applications of a construction-based approach to morphological phenomena in various languages. In addition, it offers reflections on challenges and opportunities for further research. The review highlights those aspects of the theory that have proved particularly helpful in accommodating both the regularities and the quirks that are typical of the grammar of words. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Linguistics, Volume 8 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

show abstract

Section: Li08ch03_audringsupporting

confidence: 73%

Advances in Morphological Theory: Construction Morphology and Relational Morphology

Audring

2022

Annu. Rev. Linguist.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…22 Also, it has been observed above that the adjective in syntactic A+N compounds and the genitival non-head in syntactic genitive compounds may not be modified, contrary to regular A+N and genitive phrases. This has led to analyses of these constituents as bare adjectives and nouns (i.e., nonprojecting A 0 and N 0 ) (cf., e.g., for A+N : Booij 2009;Booij 2010 [Dutch and Greek]; Masini & Benigni 2012 [Russian]; Schlücker 2014 [German]; for A+N and genitive constructions : Cetnarowska 2018;2019 [Polish]). 23 Interestingly, word-level analyses with an internal syntactic structure…”

Section: Theoretical Approaches To Syntactic Compoundsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Section 4.2). So it does not come as a surprise that in recent years various constructionist analyses have been offered for the patterns discussed here for several languages (e.g., Booij 2009;Van Goethem & Amiot 2019;Masini 2009;2019b;Cetnarowska 2018;Masini & Benigni 2012;Schlücker 2014). 24 Die Online-Ausgabe dieser Publikation ist Open Access verfügbar und im Rahmen der Creative Commons Lizenz CC-BY 4.0 wiederverwendbar.…”

Section: Theoretical Approaches To Syntactic Compoundsunclassified

Empty nominalization over antonymous juxtaposition/coordination and the emergence of a new syntactic construction

Ogawa¹,

Niikuni²,

Wada³

2020

ZWJW

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relation between word-formation and syntax and whether they form distinct domains of grammar or not has been discussed controversially in different theoretical frameworks. The answer to this question is closely connected to the languages under discussion, among other things, because languages seem to differ considerably in this regard. The discussion in this paper focuses on nominal compounds and phrases. On the basis of a great variety of data from a total of 14 European languages, it is argued that the relation between compounds and phrases, and, more generally, between word formation and syntax, should be characterized not in terms of a categorical but instead in terms of a gradient distinction.

show abstract

Complex Words

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Phrasal Names in Polish: A+N, N+A and N+N Units

Cited by 24 publications

References 11 publications

Advances in Morphological Theory: Construction Morphology and Relational Morphology

Advances in Morphological Theory: Construction Morphology and Relational Morphology

Empty nominalization over antonymous juxtaposition/coordination and the emergence of a new syntactic construction

Complex Words

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About