2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.110700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phthalate exposure alters gut microbiota composition and IgM vaccine response in human newborns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 66 , 67 ] Cross-Infection Enhancement (infection enhancement of one virus by antibodies from another virus) [ 68 , 69 ] Vaccine-associated Virus Interference (where vaccinated individuals may be at increased risk for other respiratory viruses because they do not receive the non-specific immunity associated with natural infection) [ [70] , [71] , [72] , [73] , [74] , [75] ]; Vaccine-Associated Imprinting Reduction (where vaccinations could also reduce the benefits of ‘imprinting’, a protection conferred upon children who experienced infection at an early age) [ 76 , 77 ]; Non-Specific Vaccine Effects on Immune System (where previous infections can alter an individual's susceptibility to unrelated diseases) [ 78 , 79 ]; Impact of Infection Route on Immune System (where immune protection can be influenced by the route of exposure/delivery) [ [80] , [81] , [82] ]; Impact of Combinations of Toxic Stimuli (where people are exposed over their lifetime to myriad toxic stimuli that may impact the influence of any vaccine) [78; 83, 84]; Antigenic Distance Hypothesis (negative interference from prior season’s influenza vaccine (v1) on the current season’s vaccine (v2) protection may occur when the antigenic distance is small between v1 and v2 (v1 ≈ v2) but large between v1 and the current epidemic (e) strain (v1 ≠ e).) [ [85] , [86] , [87] ]; Bystander Activation (activation of T cells specific for an antigen X during an immune response against antigen Y) [ [88] , [89] , [90] ]; Gut Microbiota (Impact of gut microbial composition on vaccine response) [ [91] , [92] , [93] , [94] , [95] ]; Homologous Challenge Infection Enhancement (the strain of challenge virus used in the testing assay is very closely related to the seed virus strain used to produce the vaccine that a subject received) [ [96] , [97] , [98] ]; Immune Evasion (evasion of host response to viral infection) [ …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 66 , 67 ] Cross-Infection Enhancement (infection enhancement of one virus by antibodies from another virus) [ 68 , 69 ] Vaccine-associated Virus Interference (where vaccinated individuals may be at increased risk for other respiratory viruses because they do not receive the non-specific immunity associated with natural infection) [ [70] , [71] , [72] , [73] , [74] , [75] ]; Vaccine-Associated Imprinting Reduction (where vaccinations could also reduce the benefits of ‘imprinting’, a protection conferred upon children who experienced infection at an early age) [ 76 , 77 ]; Non-Specific Vaccine Effects on Immune System (where previous infections can alter an individual's susceptibility to unrelated diseases) [ 78 , 79 ]; Impact of Infection Route on Immune System (where immune protection can be influenced by the route of exposure/delivery) [ [80] , [81] , [82] ]; Impact of Combinations of Toxic Stimuli (where people are exposed over their lifetime to myriad toxic stimuli that may impact the influence of any vaccine) [78; 83, 84]; Antigenic Distance Hypothesis (negative interference from prior season’s influenza vaccine (v1) on the current season’s vaccine (v2) protection may occur when the antigenic distance is small between v1 and v2 (v1 ≈ v2) but large between v1 and the current epidemic (e) strain (v1 ≠ e).) [ [85] , [86] , [87] ]; Bystander Activation (activation of T cells specific for an antigen X during an immune response against antigen Y) [ [88] , [89] , [90] ]; Gut Microbiota (Impact of gut microbial composition on vaccine response) [ [91] , [92] , [93] , [94] , [95] ]; Homologous Challenge Infection Enhancement (the strain of challenge virus used in the testing assay is very closely related to the seed virus strain used to produce the vaccine that a subject received) [ [96] , [97] , [98] ]; Immune Evasion (evasion of host response to viral infection) [ …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The host immune response to the environmental pollutants is closely related to the resident commensal microbiota. The latest study reported that early-life DEHP exposure altered gut microbiota of newborns and changed their immune responses in later life [80]. Here, the expression of key genes indicated slightly different immune responses between male and female zebrafish by DEHP exposure, which may connect with various alterations of intestinal bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…• In BALB/c mice testosterone concentration decreased. Studies in humans Yang et al (2019) Newborns DEHP exposure in through medical treatment…”
Section: (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al (2020) postulate that the differences in the toxicity of DEP on different strains and species of rodents are related to the distinctive DEPinduced changes in gut. Lastly, Yang et al (2019) investigated whether phthalate exposure in newborns through medical treatment that required intravenous infusions had an impact on gut microbiota composition and diversity and found that this type of exposure caused gut dysbiosis, with decreased Rothia sp. and Bifidobacterium longum.…”
Section: (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%