2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phubbed and curious: The relation between partner phubbing and electronic partner surveillance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars argue that both verbal and non-verbal variety of behaviors may boost one's perception that the partner understands and validates them (eye contact, proximity, etc., Argyle & Dean, 1965). Although PPR has been found to be predicted negatively by phubbing (Frackowiak et al, 2022;Schokkenbroek et al, 2022), we suggest that understanding and validation may prevent phubbing's negative impact on emotions during the interaction. Arguably, individuals may differ in how responsive they can be while using a mobile device while interacting with the partner.…”
Section: Perceived Partner Responsiveness: Understanding and Validationmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scholars argue that both verbal and non-verbal variety of behaviors may boost one's perception that the partner understands and validates them (eye contact, proximity, etc., Argyle & Dean, 1965). Although PPR has been found to be predicted negatively by phubbing (Frackowiak et al, 2022;Schokkenbroek et al, 2022), we suggest that understanding and validation may prevent phubbing's negative impact on emotions during the interaction. Arguably, individuals may differ in how responsive they can be while using a mobile device while interacting with the partner.…”
Section: Perceived Partner Responsiveness: Understanding and Validationmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The results ground perceived partner responsiveness as a main construct defining intimacy in a relationship (Reis et al, 2004), but also indicates that it is a relevant psychological mechanism that can buffer the negative perception of phubbing. Interestingly, phubbing has been found previously to affect perceived partner responsiveness negatively (Beukeboom & Pollmann, 2021;[blinded]; Schokkenbroek et al, 2022), but when a partner is perceived as understanding and validating even during the phubbing, it can counteract the negative emotional experiences.…”
Section: Lonelinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that the connection between romantic relationship satisfaction and phubbing gains significance when influenced or moderated by variables such as family patterns 29 . Moreover, it has been observed that individuals may resort to phubbing their partners in response to heightened anxiety stress and FoMO 7 , aiming to alleviate negative emotions 40 , 41 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Cyberbullying (i.e., being bullied online; e.g., Giumetti et al, 2022) Electronic partner surveillance (i.e., monitoring your partner online; e.g., Schokkenbroek et al, 2022) Fear of missing out (i.e., online observing that others have fun and feeling left out; e.g., Tandon et al, 2021) Phubbing (i.e., being ignored due to others' preoccupation online; e.g., Xu et al, 2022) Social media ostracism (e.g., Schneider et al, 2017)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic partner surveillance (i.e., monitoring your partner online; e.g., Schokkenbroek et al, 2022)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%