1981
DOI: 10.1080/00071618100650351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phycoerythrin and interfertility patterns inCallithamnion(Rhodophyta) isolates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, isolates of Callithamnion hooked (Dillwyn) S. F. Gray from disjunct north-eastern Atlantic populations were found to be completely interfertile and formed normal F1 gametophytes (Rueness & Rueness, 1982). Interfertility was also found (Spencer et al, 1981) between four isolates of C. byssoides Harvey from Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina and Georgia and with an isolate of C. halliae F. S. Collins from Texas. However, none of these strains were interfertile with an isolate of C. byssoides from Norway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Similarly, isolates of Callithamnion hooked (Dillwyn) S. F. Gray from disjunct north-eastern Atlantic populations were found to be completely interfertile and formed normal F1 gametophytes (Rueness & Rueness, 1982). Interfertility was also found (Spencer et al, 1981) between four isolates of C. byssoides Harvey from Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina and Georgia and with an isolate of C. halliae F. S. Collins from Texas. However, none of these strains were interfertile with an isolate of C. byssoides from Norway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…3 in Rueness and L'Hardy Halos 1991), spermatangial systems in compact hemispherical clusters, and the dioecious condition. Spencer et al (1981) reported a Texas (Gulf of Mexico) isolate of C. halliae (UTEX#LB 141 1) to be interfertile with isolates referred to as C. byssoides sensu Edwards (1969sensu Edwards ( , 1970 from North America, pointing out that the male strain utilized in their crosses was "morphologically indistinguishable from males designated as C. byssoides."…”
Section: However Callithamnion Bailqimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions have existed for some time as to whether North American specimens identified as Callithamnion byssoides Arnott ex Harvey (1833) should be labeled C. pseudobyssoides (Rueness and Rueness 1980;Spencer et al 1981).…”
Section: Callithamnion Lyngbye 1819mentioning
confidence: 99%