1949
DOI: 10.1038/164167a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phyllotaxis and Organogenesis in Ferns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
2

Year Published

1951
1951
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the models of Wardlaw (1949) and Snow (1931, 1933) propose different mechanisms for positioning leaf primordia, they can not be distinguished experimentally. In addition, models involving inhibitory gradients have existed for over 80 years (Schoute, 1913), yet a substance(s) controlling leaf positioning in plants has not been identified.…”
Section: Models For Leaf Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the models of Wardlaw (1949) and Snow (1931, 1933) propose different mechanisms for positioning leaf primordia, they can not be distinguished experimentally. In addition, models involving inhibitory gradients have existed for over 80 years (Schoute, 1913), yet a substance(s) controlling leaf positioning in plants has not been identified.…”
Section: Models For Leaf Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, leaf primordium 14 (black) will arise in a position between leaf primordia 9 and 11. center of the meristem and wide enough to contain a leaf primordium. Wardlaw (1949) applied a similar approach in his study of phyllotaxy in a fern, Dryopteris. Although the results of these experiments were essentially the same as those of Snow and Snow, Wardlaw concluded that physical space could not be the mechanism controlling leaf positioning in Dryopteris because the leaf primordia are so widely spaced that they are not in physical contact with each other.…”
Section: Models For Leaf Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What evidence there is relates to the "determination" of lateral appendages during vegetative growth (Cutter, 1965). Operative experiments (Wardlaw, 1949;Sussex, 1954Sussex, , 1955 and organ culture (Steeves, 1962) suggest that the fate of a primordium initiated on a flank of the apical meristem is affected by influencespresumably chemical in nature-reaching it from the apical dome itself, and by interaction with other, neighboring primordia. Thus the youngest prospective leaf primordia produce centric structures when isolated from the growth cone; but later, after some decisive event or events occurring over a definable period of time, changes occur in the primordia which constrain them to develop in a leaf-like manner, expressing dorsiventral symmetry.…”
Section: Introduction: Features Of the Developmental Process In Plmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaves of higher plants exhibit a varying degree of asymmetry along their adaxial/abaxial (upper/lower) axis. This asymmetry is thought to reflect inherent positional differences in the developing organ relative to the SAM (Wardlaw 1949). The adaxial/dorsal side of the leaf develops in close proximity to the stem cells in the SAM, whereas the abaxial/ventral side develops at a greater distance from the apex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%