2008
DOI: 10.1002/tax.574005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic analysis of Cabombaceae and Nymphaeaceae based on vegetative and leaf architectural characters

Abstract: Vegetative and leaf architectural characters are used to assess the phylogenetic relationships of species of Cabombaceae and Nymphaeaceae. Twenty-eight species representing all eight genera and the five subgenera of Nymphaea are analyzed. These morphological analyses give robust support to other molecular and morphological analyses of the relationships of the two families. There is strong support for the two families to be monophyletic, and that Euryale and Victoria are closely related. Strict consensus analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
27
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These occur among Nymphaeaceae, Piperaceae and Saururaceae. However, Nymphaeaceae are characterized by deeply cordate leaf bases (Taylor, 2008) and hydropotes (Kaul, 1976) that are absent in Spixiarum. Furthermore, Piper aceae and Saururaceae display tetracytic stomata (Kubitzki & al., 1993).…”
Section: Spixiarum Kipeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These occur among Nymphaeaceae, Piperaceae and Saururaceae. However, Nymphaeaceae are characterized by deeply cordate leaf bases (Taylor, 2008) and hydropotes (Kaul, 1976) that are absent in Spixiarum. Furthermore, Piper aceae and Saururaceae display tetracytic stomata (Kubitzki & al., 1993).…”
Section: Spixiarum Kipeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In numerous detailed studies comparing leaf architecture among fossil species from different strata with extant species, evolutionary trends of venation patterns within plant families and genera could be shown (Hickey and Wolfe 1975;Fuller and Hickey 2005;Taylor 2008). Some studies investigated leaf morphology and anatomy of fossils assigned to Rosaceae (Lis 1992;De Leon and Cevallos-Ferriz 2000;Erwin and Schorn 2000;DeVore and Pigg 2007), but leaf architecture found in fossil species of the genus Rosa compared with those of extant rose species has not been surveyed in detail yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nymphaea plus these three genera have been referred to as core Nymphaeaceae (Borsch et al ., 2008). Morphological analyses support the sister relationship between subgenus Nymphaea and the rest of core Nymphaeaceae (Borsch et al ., 2008; Taylor, 2008) and there are differences in floral biology and probably also of breeding system (Wiersema, 1988). Little is known of progamic phase biology in any of these groups apart from the greenhouse study of N. capensis within the pantropical subgenus Brachyceras (Orban & Bouharmont, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%