2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic analysis of classical swine fever virus isolated from Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Thailand, subgroup 2.2 became predominant from 1996 onwards. In Taiwan, there has been a switch from subgroups 3.4 to 2.1 after 1996 [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Thailand, subgroup 2.2 became predominant from 1996 onwards. In Taiwan, there has been a switch from subgroups 3.4 to 2.1 after 1996 [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, outbreaks of CSFV are often associated with high economic losses due to national movement restrictions and international trade implications. Recently, it has been suggested that there is a change in subgenotype from the historical group 1 or 3 to genogroup 2 (Deng et al 2005;Cha et al 2007). Currently used vaccine strains belong almost exclusively to genogroup 1.…”
Section: Dear Readermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Taiwan, by analyzing the E2 sequences of CSFV from field outbreaks during 1993–2001, CSFVs have been classified into two subgroups – 3.4 and 2.1 [3,4]. Also, the Taiwanese strains of 2.1 were further divided into two different genotypes termed 2.1a and 2.1b which might be introduced from different origins [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%