2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00616.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Analysis of the Evolutionary Correlation Using Likelihood

Abstract: Many evolutionary processes can lead to a change in the correlation between continuous characters over time or on differentbranches of a phylogenetic tree. Shifts in genetic or functional constraint, in the selective regime, or in some combination thereof can influence both the evolution of continuous traits and their relation to each other. These changes can often be mapped on a phylogenetic tree to examine their influence on multivariate phenotypic diversification. We propose a new likelihood method to fit m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
194
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
6
194
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this metric provides a quantitative way to compare the extent of diversity among extant species, it ignores the influence of shared evolutionary history among them, which may confound apparent variance and covariance among species 39,40 . To evaluate feeding mode's effect on morphological evolution, we used reconstructions of phylogenetic and feeding mode history as the basis for estimating different evolutionary rate matrices for mechanical units (that is, the multivariate pattern of evolutionary change based on a Brownian motion model of evolution) in suction feeders and biters 36 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this metric provides a quantitative way to compare the extent of diversity among extant species, it ignores the influence of shared evolutionary history among them, which may confound apparent variance and covariance among species 39,40 . To evaluate feeding mode's effect on morphological evolution, we used reconstructions of phylogenetic and feeding mode history as the basis for estimating different evolutionary rate matrices for mechanical units (that is, the multivariate pattern of evolutionary change based on a Brownian motion model of evolution) in suction feeders and biters 36 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collected morphological data for cranial skeletal elements and information on feeding mode, and combined these data with reconstructions of species' phylogenetic relationships. To test our predictions, we fit evolutionary models that allow biting and suction feeding lineages to differ in the correlations between and rates of diversification within different aspects of the cranial skeleton 36 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…plant functional traits), comparative tests consisting of data for both woody and herbaceous species should test for differences in the strength of trait correlations. This would effectively treat branches of differing growth form as separate in a comparative test (Revell & Collar 2009). Growth-form-dependent trait correlations may help to understand additional factors (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These analyses yielded significant allometric effects (see Results). Thus, to examine the relationship among diet, cranial and mandibular shape independently of size, we computed shape residuals through a multivariate regression of phylogenetic independent contrasts (PIC) of Procrustes coordinates on the PIC of centroid size [45]. We then summarized these residuals through a phylogenetic principal component (pPC) analysis that computes the pPC scores in the original species space (package phytools v. 0.5-20; [46]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%