2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-017-3531-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic analysis of VP1 and RdRP genes of Brazilian aichivirus B strains involved in a diarrhea outbreak in dairy calves

Abstract: Aichivirus B has been reported worldwide in calves and adult cattle with and without diarrhea. The aim of this study was to describe the molecular characteristics of the RdRP and VP1 genes of aichivirus B strains identified as the most frequent etiologic agent in a neonatal diarrhea outbreak in a high-production Brazilian dairy cattle herd. Preliminary laboratory analysis ruled out important enteropathogens (Cryptosporidium spp; Eimeria spp., E. coli F5, and bovine coronavirus). Fecal samples from diarrheic (n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact role of BKV in the pathogenesis of diarrhea is not fully elucidated; however, the detection rate of BKV in fecal samples from calves with clinical signs is higher when compared with animals without clinic signs, reinforcing the participation of BKV in the pathogenesis of diarrhea [35]. In this study, BKV was identified in mixed infections, and similar findings were previously described [21,36], suggesting that the occurrence of this virus may be associated with the concomitant presence of other diarrheic pathogens of cattle.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exact role of BKV in the pathogenesis of diarrhea is not fully elucidated; however, the detection rate of BKV in fecal samples from calves with clinical signs is higher when compared with animals without clinic signs, reinforcing the participation of BKV in the pathogenesis of diarrhea [35]. In this study, BKV was identified in mixed infections, and similar findings were previously described [21,36], suggesting that the occurrence of this virus may be associated with the concomitant presence of other diarrheic pathogens of cattle.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Aliquots of sterile ultrapure diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water were included as negative controls in all procedures. Samples previously known as positive for each of the virus investigated in this study were included as positive controls: prototype NADL and Mebus strains cell culture (Madin-Darby bovine kidney) adapted for BVDV and BCoV, respectively, and fecal samples known to be positive for RVA [9] and BKV [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The globally distributed bovine diarrhea disease seriously harms the health of animals, causing tremendous economic losses to the cattle industry (Brar et al 2017, Han et al 2017, Ribeiro et al 2017, Li et al 2018a. A lot of measures including vaccinations, medications and herd management have been taken with the go of decreasing the economic losses caused by diarrhea, however, the overall effect has been limited (Cho andYoon 2014, Li et al 2018a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its serendipitous discovery as a cell culture contaminant, the presence of BKV in bovine faecal samples has been reported in Japan, Thailand (Yamashita et al., 2003), South Korea (Jeoung et al., 2011; Park et al., 2011), China (Chang et al., 2014; Li et al., 2019), Hungary (Reuter & Egyed, 2009), Belgium (Mauroy et al., 2009), the Netherlands (Barry et al., 2011), Italy (Di Martino et al., 2012), the United Kingdom, Turkey (Isidan et al., 2019), Egypt (Mohamed et al., 2018), Brazil (Candido et al., 2017; Ribeiro et al, 2014; Ribeiro et al., 2017) and the USA (Wang et al., 2020). Although identified in deep nasal swabs from Western Canada feedlot cattle, the presence of BKV in faecal samples from diarrhoeic calves has not been reported in Canada prior to this study (Zhang et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%