2004
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572004000400008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic autocorrelation and evolutionary diversity of Carnivora (Mammalia) in Conservation Units of the New World

Abstract: One of the main concerns of Conservation Biology is the identification of priority areas for conservation, and the development of quantitative methods is important to achieve this task. Many phylogenetic diversity indexes and higher-taxon approaches have been used in this context. In this study, Faith's phylogenetic indexes and the number of evolutionary independent lineages of Carnivora were calculated at the average patch level based on phylogenetic autocorrelation analysis of phenotypic traits, in 18 conser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, it is still inconclusive whether the distribution pattern of species richness can represent that of PD or not. Some studies have concluded that taxa richness is a good surrogate for PD, making it an effective means for identifying conservation priorities (Rodrigues & Gaston, 2002; Torres & Diniz, 2004; Brooks et al. , 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it is still inconclusive whether the distribution pattern of species richness can represent that of PD or not. Some studies have concluded that taxa richness is a good surrogate for PD, making it an effective means for identifying conservation priorities (Rodrigues & Gaston, 2002; Torres & Diniz, 2004; Brooks et al. , 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolutionary history of species residing within ecoregions is a yet unknown component of Neotropical biodiversity, although this may prove a more inclusive measure of biodiversity than species numbers (Purvis & Hector, 2000; Sechrest et al ., 2002). The inclusion of evolutionary measures such as phylogenetic diversity in prioritization exercises, as performed in this study, can be used to determine areas with greater evolutionary diversity and greater importance for the conservation of evolutionary processes (Tôrres & Diniz‐Filho, 2004). Some academic papers have suggested ways to maximize the conservation of phylogenetic diversity (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BI1 represents the geographic variation in some of the most common biodiversity variables, namely species richness, phylogenetic diversity, and the numbers of widely distributed, abundant and frequent species. Species richness and phylogenetic diversity are often positively correlated (Williams & Humphries, 1996; Tôrres & Diniz‐Filho, 2004), and the numbers of abundant and widely distributed generalist species usually contribute strongly to variation in species richness (Lennon et al. , 2004; Vázquez & Gaston, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%