Phylogenetic conservation of soil bacterial responses to simulated global changes

Abstract

Soil bacterial communities are altered by anthropogenic drivers such as climate change-related warming and fertilization. However, we lack a predictive understanding of how bacterial communities respond to such global changes. Here, we tested whether phylogenetic information might be more predictive of the response of bacterial taxa to some forms of global change than others. We analysed the composition of soil bacterial communities from perturbation experiments that simulated warming, drought, elevated CO 2 concentration and phosphorus (P) addition. Bacterial responses were phylogenetically conserved to all perturbations. The phylogenetic depth of these responses varied minimally among the types of perturbations and was similar when merging data across locations, implying that the context of particular locations did not affect the phylogenetic pattern of response. We further identified taxonomic groups that responded consistently to each type of perturbation. These patterns revealed that, at the level of family and above, most groups responded consistently to only one or two types of perturbations, suggesting that traits with different patterns of phylogenetic conservation underlie the responses to different perturbations. We conclude that a phylogenetic approach may be useful in predicting how soil bacterial communities respond to a variety of global changes. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Conceptual challenges in microbial community ecology’.

Microbial Activity in Subterranean Ecosystems: Recent Advances

“…This was consistent with a methane oxidation mediated by microorganisms and in fact, next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of sediments showed a relative abundance of Candidatus Methylomirabilis 4 to 5 times higher in the deepest sample (−80 m) with respect to −30 and −15 m. Candidatus Methylomirabilis oxyfera (Rokubacteria) is an anaerobic denitrifying methanotroph [46]. It must be noticed that Isobe et al [47] found that members of the uncultivated candidate phylum Rokubacteria responded positively to elevate CO 2 concentrations.…”

How microbes can, and cannot, be used to assess soil health

“…Microbes not only drive many important soil processes, they also respond to biotic and abiotic soil conditions. For example, consistent changes in soil microbial communities have been associated with changes in P availability (Hermans et al, 2017), soil pH (Delgado-Baquerizo et al, 2018), labile organic carbon pools (Ramírez et al, 2020), and soil moisture levels (Isobe et al, 2020). Likewise, we can often identify particular microbial taxa or functional genes associated with specific soil processes, including nitrification, methane production, denitrification, and cellulose degradation.…”

Mega-fire in Redwood Tanoak Forest Reduces Bacterial and Fungal Richness and Selects for Pyrophilous Taxa and Traits that are Phylogenetically Conserved

“…Thus, as the discovery of traits governing pyrophilous microbes’ fire response are uncovered, the ecological role of related microbes will be better predicted in future post-fire sampling. For example, bacterial response to both nitrogen addition (Isobe et al, 2019) and simulated global climate change factors was phylogenetically conserved across all perturbations (Isobe et al, 2020), which improves prediction of disturbance response of closely related taxa.…”