2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2008.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic construction of 17 bacterial phyla by new method and carefully selected orthologs

Abstract: Here, we constructed a phylogenetic tree of 17 bacterial phyla covering eubacteria and archaea by using a new method and 102 carefully selected orthologs from their genomes. One of the serious disturbing factors in phylogeny construction is the existence of out-paralogs that cannot easily be found out and discarded. In our method, out-paralogs are detected and removed by constructing a phylogenetic tree of the genes in question and examining the clustered genes in the tree. We also developed a method for compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is widely believed that genome trees based on concatenated alignments of multiple protein sequences are less susceptible to stochastic errors than those based on a single protein or gene, such as the 16S rRNA gene. Genome trees reported recently showed the power of this approach, confirming accepted phylogenies and/or presenting unexpected novel relationships at the level of phyla as well as individual species (Ciccarelli et al 2006;Wu and Eisen 2008;Ward et al 2009;Horiike et al 2009). While separation of the bacterial major phyla was largely improved in these genome trees, the inter-phyla branching order remained poorly resolved.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…It is widely believed that genome trees based on concatenated alignments of multiple protein sequences are less susceptible to stochastic errors than those based on a single protein or gene, such as the 16S rRNA gene. Genome trees reported recently showed the power of this approach, confirming accepted phylogenies and/or presenting unexpected novel relationships at the level of phyla as well as individual species (Ciccarelli et al 2006;Wu and Eisen 2008;Ward et al 2009;Horiike et al 2009). While separation of the bacterial major phyla was largely improved in these genome trees, the inter-phyla branching order remained poorly resolved.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…4) was consistent with that of the tree based on the 102 orthologous proteins with mesophilic archaea as the out-group [46] and that on the comparison of feature frequency profiles of whole proteomes [47]. In contrast, the present tree was not congruent with trees based on the cytochrome bc- complexes [48], proteins involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis [49] and 16S rDNA [26].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…coli and Homo sapiens . Furthermore, A. aeolicus is in the phylum Aquificae, which some argue contains some of the earliest eubacterial species (31), and only one ATP-dependent DNA helicase homologue was identified in A.aeolicus . Therefore, the MMR pathway in A. aeolicus may have occurred very early in evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%