Phylogenetic reconstruction of Polymastiidae (Demospongiae: Hadromerida) based on morphology

Abstract

Phylogeny of the sponge family Polymastiidae was reconstructed based on 25 morphological characters. Twenty-one polymastiid species and three suberitid species, Suberites domuncula as outgroup, Aaptos aaptos and A. papillata as sister groups, were included in the analyses. The reconstructions were done in PAUP* running heuristic search with the parsimony criterion. We analysed three possible evolutionary scenarios based on three alternative interpretations of the body plan of Quasillina brevis and Ridleia oviformis: first-Ridleia possesses aquiferous papillae whereas Quasillina lacks them, second-both genera lack papillae and third-the body in both genera is a single hyperdeveloped papilla. All three scenarios excluded the secondary loss of the papillae in the polymastiid evolution. Scenario 2 also excluded the secondary loss of the regular choanosomal skeleton, while scenario 1 assumed its loss in Ridleia and scenario 3 admitted its loss in both Ridleia and Quasillina. We prioritised scenario 2 due to its maximal parsimony and rescaled consistency index and subsequently favoured the clustering of Ridleia and Quasillina separately from the monophyletic polymastiid clade. In all three scenarios Pseudotrachya hystrix clustered separately from other polymastiids in agreement with the molecular evidence, and thus the exclusion of Pseudotrachya from Polymastiidae was proposed. The relationships between A. papillata, Tentorium semisuberites, Polymastia uberrima, the clade Weberella bursa ? Polymastia boletiformis and the main polymastiid clade were ambiguous. Meanwhile, all scenarios showed the non-monophyly of Polymastia and Aaptos. Our hypotheses should be tested by reconstructions based on larger taxon sampling of hadromerid species and larger sets of morphological and molecular characters before any ultimate taxonomic decisions are taken.Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (

Two new species of calcareous sponges (Porifera: Calcarea) from the deep Antarctic Eckström Shelf and a revised list of species found in Antarctic waters

“…Spicule preparations and spicule measurements were made following standard procedures for calcareous sponges (e.g. Rapp 2006), and thick sections were produced from epoxy embeddings, following the standard procedures by Boury-Esnault & Bézac (2007) and Plotkin et al (2012). Specimens were stained with Toloudine blue after sectioning.…”

Development of a multilocus-based approach for sponge (phylum Porifera) identification: refinement and limitations

“…Porifera are an important group of Metazoa in which species identification is particularly difficult because the available characters used for classification are limited 6 . For example, the sponge family Polymastiidae possesses a relatively simple spicule assortment providing a rather scant set of taxonomic characters 7 . Some features are in fact also displayed by some taxa from other families 7 .…”

“…For example, the sponge family Polymastiidae possesses a relatively simple spicule assortment providing a rather scant set of taxonomic characters 7 . Some features are in fact also displayed by some taxa from other families 7 . Generally, these characters are their organic and inorganic skeletons, including skeletal size, shape, structure and composition 6 .…”

Polymastiidae (Demospongiae: Hadromerida) with ornamented exotyles: a review of morphological affinities and description of a new genus and three new species

“…All observed exotyles of S. hispidus lack spines, while many principal spicules are polytylote, a feature not observed in T. stephensi . Thus, following Plotkin et al (2012) we provisionally recognize both Trachyteleia and Suberitechinus as valid genera. However, detailed and comparative descriptions along with phylogenetic analyses based on molecular and other independent datasets on Suberitechinus and other polymastiids with non-ornamented exotyles are required for the definitive classification of these taxa.…”

“…At the same time Spinularia spp. lack exotyles and possess a marginal spicule fringe (Plotkin et al , 2012) that is absent in S. raphidophora . External morphology of S. raphidophora and its exotyles with rounded tuberculated distal extremities resemble those of S. capitatus and S. isidis , although the distal swellings on the exotyles of the latter two species are more prominent.…”