2000
DOI: 10.2108/zsj.17.485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Relationships among Six Flying Squirrel Genera, Inferred from Mitochondrial Cytochrome b Gene Sequences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
14
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The grouping of Glaucomys and Hylopetes observed in this study is in consistent with what has been observed by Mercer and Roth (2003). Considering the molecular analyses made by Oshida et al (2000b) and Herron et al (2004), it is well established that the Glaucomys-Hylopetes clade is specifically allied with the Belomys-Trogopterus clade. However, the tie between these two clades is not universally clear-cut because they were clustered into different groups based on the morphological data (Thorington and Darrow, 2000) and the molecular data (Mercer and Roth, 2003).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationships Between Eupetaurus and Other Flyisupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The grouping of Glaucomys and Hylopetes observed in this study is in consistent with what has been observed by Mercer and Roth (2003). Considering the molecular analyses made by Oshida et al (2000b) and Herron et al (2004), it is well established that the Glaucomys-Hylopetes clade is specifically allied with the Belomys-Trogopterus clade. However, the tie between these two clades is not universally clear-cut because they were clustered into different groups based on the morphological data (Thorington and Darrow, 2000) and the molecular data (Mercer and Roth, 2003).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationships Between Eupetaurus and Other Flyisupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results strongly support their hypotheses. Also, it is noteworthy that in all analyses Pteromys is consistently basal to other flying squirrels, in agreement with the recent findings of Herron et al (2004), but inconsistent with the results of Oshida et al (2000b) and Mercer and Roth (2003). These discrepancies suggest that the phylogenetic topology of flying squirrels may be different when different outgroup or genes were used for phylogenetic reconstruction.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Relationships Between Eupetaurus and Other Flyisupporting
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some examples of relatively recent research results producing fresh insights into phylogenetic relationships within and among genera cover flying squirrels (Oshida et al, 2000a(Oshida et al, , 2000bOshida et al, 2001a;Thorington et al, 2002;Yu et al, 2004Yu et al, , 2006Arbogast, 2007); Japanese species of Sciuridae (Oshida et al, 1996); species of Sciurus (Oshida and Masuda, 2000), Callosciurus (Oshida et al, 2001b), and Dremomys (Li et al, 2008); ground squirrels (Harrison et al, 2003;Herron et al, 2004;Helgen et al, 2009); marmots (Steppan et al, 1999); and chipmunks (Banbury and Spicer, 2007).…”
Section: Endemic Sulawesi Squirrels In Phylogenetic Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%