1994
DOI: 10.2503/jjshs.62.755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Relationships Among the "True Citrus Fruit Trees" by Glutamate Oxaloacetate Transaminase Isozymes Analysis.

Abstract: Leaf isozymes of glutamate oxaloaceate transaminase (EC 2.6.1.1; GOT) in the "true citrus fruit trees" group of Citrinae were analyzed using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to elucidate phylogenetic relationships among them. Segregation at each of three loci, Got-1, Got-2 and Got-3 of GOT isozymes in the progenies obtained from intergeneric crosses between Citrus and Microcitrus species followed a simple Mendelian inheritance, suggesting that Microcitrus and Citrus species have similar genetic systems and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The genera of the Citrus clade are very closely related, as indicated by morphology and anatomy (i.e., increased number of stamens, stalked fusiform pulp vesicles), numerical analysis (Barrett and Rhodes, 1976 [3] ), karyology (heterochromatin bands on six to all nine chromosome pairs: Guerra et al, 2000 [29] ), phytochemistry (see Waterman and Grundon, 1983 [70] ; Da Silva, Gottlieb, and Ehrendorfer, 1988 [9] ), isozymes (Fang, Zhang, and Xiao, 1993 [13] ; Fang and Zhang, 1994 [12] ; Rahman and Nito, 1994 [50] ), and hybrid compatibility among genera within the clade (Barrett, 1978 [2] ; Mabberley, 1998 [42] ) but also with genera as remote as Murraya s.s. and Severinia. All this prompted Mabberley (1998 [42] ) to revive an older suggestion to unify all taxa of the Citrus clade (in addition to the genera studied here, Microcitrus) into one genus, i.e.…”
Section: Aurantioideaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genera of the Citrus clade are very closely related, as indicated by morphology and anatomy (i.e., increased number of stamens, stalked fusiform pulp vesicles), numerical analysis (Barrett and Rhodes, 1976 [3] ), karyology (heterochromatin bands on six to all nine chromosome pairs: Guerra et al, 2000 [29] ), phytochemistry (see Waterman and Grundon, 1983 [70] ; Da Silva, Gottlieb, and Ehrendorfer, 1988 [9] ), isozymes (Fang, Zhang, and Xiao, 1993 [13] ; Fang and Zhang, 1994 [12] ; Rahman and Nito, 1994 [50] ), and hybrid compatibility among genera within the clade (Barrett, 1978 [2] ; Mabberley, 1998 [42] ) but also with genera as remote as Murraya s.s. and Severinia. All this prompted Mabberley (1998 [42] ) to revive an older suggestion to unify all taxa of the Citrus clade (in addition to the genera studied here, Microcitrus) into one genus, i.e.…”
Section: Aurantioideaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…in its leaf-venation, resembling that in Clymenia, has also been hybridised with Eremocitrus (Rahman & Nito 1994)) and successful intergeneric grafts made. This latter is of great importance as Tristeza Virus-resistant rootstocks from a number of allied taxa can be combined with susceptible scions of commercially important citrus.…”
Section: Citrus Citrus Halimiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early taxonomic studies of the Citrus genus were mainly based on morphological and biochemical properties (Tatum et al, 1974;Barrett and Rhode, 1976;Scora, 1988). Initial molecular characterization included isozyme- (Rahman andNito, 1994) andDNA-(Federici et al, 1998;Nicolosi et al, 2000;Abkenar et al, 2004) based analyses, which were used to more clearly elucidate the citrus taxa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%