2004
DOI: 10.12782/specdiv.9.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Relationships and New Classification of the Superfamily Scorpaenoidea (Actinopterygii: Perciformes)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
67
2
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
7
67
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems to be impossible to describe accurately the phylogenetic relationships among scorpaenids at present. The present situation between the type II-1 and II-3 is well refl ected in the morphological phylogenetic relationship by Imamura (2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It seems to be impossible to describe accurately the phylogenetic relationships among scorpaenids at present. The present situation between the type II-1 and II-3 is well refl ected in the morphological phylogenetic relationship by Imamura (2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In the phylogenetic relationship among scorpaenids, two different opinions were expressed recently. Imamura (2004) described that Sebastiscus is contained in the most basal clade, Sebastes in the second most basal clade, and other genera are derivative by morphological analysis. In contrast, Smith and Wheeler (2004) indicated that Sebastes forms a cluster with Helicolenus and are derivative within the scorpaenids, by comparing with about 3400 aligned base pairs of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The scorpaenoid lineage comprises two groups, the scorpaenoids and the platycephaloids, with a total of 19 families (see Ishida, 1994;Imamura, 1996). The monophyly of this group has been much debated (see Matsubara, 1943;Ishida, 1994;Imamura, 1996Imamura, , 2004Imamura and Shinohara, 1998;Mandrytsa, 2001;Imamura and Yabe, 2002). The monophyly of the scorpaenoid lineage is supported by several osteological (presence of backwardly directed opercular spine that extends beyond the subopercle; suborbital stay with its end pointed; uppermost pectoral radial and scapula fused; presence of spines associated with the parietal sensory canal), larval (single postocular spine in larval stage) and myological (presence of adductor dorsalis; transversus lateralis posterior with a tendon anteriorly and extrinsic swimbladder muscle derived from obliquus superioris) characters.…”
Section: Interrelationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%