2015
DOI: 10.1163/1937240x-00002317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic relationships between living and fossil spinicaudatan taxa (Branchiopoda Spinicaudata): reconsidering the evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
49
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The classificaiton schemes of fossil clam shrimps of Zhang et al (1976) and Chen and Shen (1985) are followed here, which include a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships between fossil and living groups based on stratigraphic occurrence and morphological features of the carapaces. The scientific value and validity of the Chinese classification schemes have recently been reviewed by Astrop and Hegna (2015 Dimensions. In order: specimen no., number of growth lines, length of carapace (mm), heigh of carapace (mm), ratio of heigh/length: NIGPCAS 161744, 19, 3.1, 2.5, 0.81;NIGPCAS 161745, >11, 3.2, 2.1, 0.66;NIGPCAS 161746, 14, 2.7, 1.9, 0.70;NIGPCAS 161747, 15, 2.5, 1.6, 0.64;NIGPCAS 161748, 14, 2.7, 1.8, 0.67;NIGPCAS 161749, 16, 2.3, 1.6, 0.70;NIGPCAS 161750, 18, 2.4, 1.7, 0.71;NIGPCAS 161751, >10, 2.5, 1.8, 0.75;NIGPCAS 161752a, >11, 3.4, >1.7, >0.5; NIGPCAS 161752b, >11, 3.1, ?, ?…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classificaiton schemes of fossil clam shrimps of Zhang et al (1976) and Chen and Shen (1985) are followed here, which include a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships between fossil and living groups based on stratigraphic occurrence and morphological features of the carapaces. The scientific value and validity of the Chinese classification schemes have recently been reviewed by Astrop and Hegna (2015 Dimensions. In order: specimen no., number of growth lines, length of carapace (mm), heigh of carapace (mm), ratio of heigh/length: NIGPCAS 161744, 19, 3.1, 2.5, 0.81;NIGPCAS 161745, >11, 3.2, 2.1, 0.66;NIGPCAS 161746, 14, 2.7, 1.9, 0.70;NIGPCAS 161747, 15, 2.5, 1.6, 0.64;NIGPCAS 161748, 14, 2.7, 1.8, 0.67;NIGPCAS 161749, 16, 2.3, 1.6, 0.70;NIGPCAS 161750, 18, 2.4, 1.7, 0.71;NIGPCAS 161751, >10, 2.5, 1.8, 0.75;NIGPCAS 161752a, >11, 3.4, >1.7, >0.5; NIGPCAS 161752b, >11, 3.1, ?, ?…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various classification schemes in use (e.g. Astrop & Hegna ) are a result of the weight workers place on different diagnostic features. The shape of the carapace is subject to natural variability, ontogenetic shape variation and deformation, more so than ornamentation, which is unfortunately often not preserved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(), Martin & Davis (), Braband et al . (), Olesen (), Olesen & Richter (), Astrop & Hegna () and Scholze et al . ().…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologyunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the monophyly of the Spinicaudata, which includes the vast majority of "clam shrimp," is firmly established (e.g., Olesen, 2000Olesen, , 2009Stenderup et al, 2006;Richter et al, 2007;Schwentner et al, 2009). A recent review by Astrop and Hegna (2015) examined the relationships among living and fossil spinicaudatans, and their recommendations are followed herein. The systematic terminology used herein follows that of Olesen (2000) and Martin and Davis (2001) for higher-level classification and follows Chen and Shen (1985) for superfamilial and lower levels.…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologymentioning
confidence: 99%