Phylogenetic relationships of Andean-Ecuadorian populations of<i>Anastrepha fraterculus</i>(Wiedemann 1830) (Diptera: Tephritidae) inferred from COI and COII gene sequences

Ludeña, Bertha; Bayas, R.; Pintaud, Jean‐Christophe

doi:10.1080/00379271.2010.10697673

Cited by 13 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the phylogenetic analysis, all C. capitata bred from M. zeyheri were grouped together in a single clade, with the isolates obtained from the NCBI database showing a monophyletic relationship. The isolates were also rich in AT nucleotidic composition, which is consistent with previous descriptions for other insects 23 and mites. 24 This is the first confirmed report of C. capitata on M. zeyheri.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Mediterranean fruit fly on Mimusops zeyheri indigenous to South Africa: a threat to the horticulture industry

Dube

Mashela

Mathabatha

2015

Pest Management Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Mediterranean fruit fly on Mimusops zeyheri indigenous to South Africa: a threat to the horticulture industry

Dube

Mashela

Mathabatha

2015

Pest Management Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, Ludueña et al (2010) reported a distinct clade in the Ecuatorian Andes, whereas Ruiz-Arce et al (2012) revealed the existence of six genetically distinct populations of A. obliqua among which the magnitude of differences warrants taxonomic revision. However, the A. fraterculus group as a whole may still contain substantial hidden diversity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the A. fraterculus group as a whole may still contain substantial hidden diversity. For example, Ludueña et al (2010) reported a distinct clade in the Ecuatorian Andes, whereas Ruiz-Arce et al (2012) revealed the existence of six genetically distinct populations of A. obliqua among which the magnitude of differences warrants taxonomic revision. This recent and rapid differentiation renders the A. fraterculus species group a potential model for the understanding of divergence in tropical frugivorous insects but also renders management of pest species a highly complex task.…”

Section: Smithmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ongoing speciation within the Anastrepha fraterculus cryptic species complex: the case of the Andean morphotype

Devescovi

Abraham

Roriz

et al. 2014

Entomologia Exp Applicata

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) cryptic species complex is currently composed of seven taxonomically recognized morphotypes. Both, pre‐ and post‐zygotic isolation has been documented among four of these morphotypes, revealing that in fact they appear to be distinct biological entities. In order to progress in the full delimitation of species within the complex, we examined reproductive isolation between a Colombian population of the Andean morphotype and populations belonging to four other morphotypes spanning from Mexico to Argentina. Flies from the Andean morphotype exhibited strong pre‐zygotic mating isolation through temporal partitioning of mating activity. Post‐zygotic isolation was observed for crosses of males of all morphotypes and Andean morphotype females, yet most of the F1 hybrid ♂ × F1 hybrid ♀ self‐crosses showed normal levels of fertility, a finding suggesting a nuclear–cytoplasmic interaction according to previous studies. Overall, the Andean morphotype within the complex also appears to be a distinct biological entity. We discuss the implications of these findings for the understanding of speciation mechanisms in the Neotropical genus Anastrepha.

show abstract

“…Microsatellites were developed (Lanzavecchia et al 2014) and proved to be successful to discriminate among morphotypes (Lima et al unpublished data, Manni et al 2015). The phylogenetic relationships of Andean-Ecuadorian populations were determined with other molecular markers (Ludeña et al 2011). …”

Section: Situation Analysis At the Start Of The Crp And Ouputs For Eamentioning

confidence: 99%

Resolving cryptic species complexes of major tephritid pests

Hendrichs¹,

Vera²,

Meyer³

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An (CRP)FAO/IAEA Co-ordinated Research Project on “Resolution of Cryptic Species Complexes of Tephritid Pests to Overcome Constraints to SIT Application and International Trade” was conducted from 2010 to 2015. As captured in the CRP title, the objective was to undertake targeted research into the systematics and diagnostics of taxonomically challenging fruit fly groups of economic importance. The scientific output was the accurate alignment of biological species with taxonomic names; which led to the applied outcome of assisting FAO and IAEA Member States in overcoming technical constraints to the application of the (SIT)Sterile Insect Technique against pest fruit flies and the facilitation of international agricultural trade. Close to 50 researchers from over 20 countries participated in the CRP, using coordinated, multidisciplinary research to address, within an integrative taxonomic framework, cryptic species complexes of major tephritid pests. The following progress was made for the four complexes selected and studied:Anastrepha fraterculus complex – Eight morphotypes and their geographic and ecological distributions in Latin America were defined. The morphotypes can be considered as distinct biological species on the basis of differences in karyotype, sexual incompatibility, post-mating isolation, cuticular hydrocarbon, pheromone, and molecular analyses. Discriminative taxonomic tools using linear and geometric morphometrics of both adult and larval morphology were developed for this complex.Bactrocera dorsalis complex – Based on genetic, cytogenetic, pheromonal, morphometric, and behavioural data, which showed no or only minor variation between the Asian/African pest fruit flies Bactrocera dorsalis, Bactrocera papayae, Bactrocera philippinensis and Bactrocera invadens, the latter three species were synonymized with Bactrocera dorsalis. Of the five target pest taxa studied, only Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera carambolae remain as scientifically valid names. Molecular and pheromone markers are now available to distinguish Bactrocera dorsalis from Bactrocera carambolae.Ceratitis FAR Complex (Ceratitis fasciventris, Ceratitis anonae, Ceratitis rosa) – Morphology, morphometry, genetic, genomic, pheromone, cuticular hydrocarbon, ecology, behaviour, and developmental physiology data provide evidence for the existence of five different entities within this fruit fly complex from the African region. These are currently recognised as Ceratitis anonae, Ceratitis fasciventris (F1 and F2), Ceratitis rosa and a new species related to Ceratitis rosa (R2). The biological limits within Ceratitis fasciventris (i.e. F1 and F2) are not fully resolved. Microsatellites markers and morphological identification tools for the adult males of the five different FAR entities were developed based on male leg structures.Zeugodacus cucurbitae (formerly Bactrocera (Zeugodacus) cucurbitae) – Genetic variability was studied among melon fly populations throughout its geographic range in Africa and the Asia/Pacific region and found to ...

show abstract

Phylogenetic relationships of Andean-Ecuadorian populations ofAnastrepha fraterculus(Wiedemann 1830) (Diptera: Tephritidae) inferred from COI and COII gene sequences

Cited by 13 publications

References 27 publications

Mediterranean fruit fly on Mimusops zeyheri indigenous to South Africa: a threat to the horticulture industry

Mediterranean fruit fly on Mimusops zeyheri indigenous to South Africa: a threat to the horticulture industry

Ongoing speciation within the Anastrepha fraterculus cryptic species complex: the case of the Andean morphotype

Resolving cryptic species complexes of major tephritid pests

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About