2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2005.00201.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic relationships of spatangoid sea urchins (Echinoidea): taxon sampling density and congruence between morphological and molecular estimates

Abstract: . (2005). Phylogenetic relationships of spatangoid sea urchins (Echinoidea): taxon sampling density and congruence between morphological and molecular estimates. -Zoologica Scripta , 34 , 447-468. A phylogeny for 21 species of spatangoid sea urchins is constructed using data from three genes and results compared with morphology-based phylogenies derived for the same taxa and for a much larger sample of 88 Recent and fossil taxa. Different data sets and methods of analysis generate different phylogenetic hypoth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
64
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been two detailed phylogenetic analyses of spatangoids recently (Villier et al 2004;Stockley et al 2005). Our analysis identifies basically the same pattern, with toxasterids as the most primitive member and hemiasterids, aeropsids and micrasterids as relatively deep branches that just survive to the present.…”
Section: Stirodonts Our Analyses Clearly Suggest That the Ordermentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There have been two detailed phylogenetic analyses of spatangoids recently (Villier et al 2004;Stockley et al 2005). Our analysis identifies basically the same pattern, with toxasterids as the most primitive member and hemiasterids, aeropsids and micrasterids as relatively deep branches that just survive to the present.…”
Section: Stirodonts Our Analyses Clearly Suggest That the Ordermentioning
confidence: 76%
“…While there have been relatively few analyses that cover the entire group, there have been a relatively large number of cladistic analyses that have focussed on individual groups within the Echinoidea aimed at understanding detailed relationships: cidaroids (Smith & Wright 1989;Matsuoka & Inamori 1999), echinothurioids (Smith & Wright 1990;Mooi et al 2004), diadematoids (Smith & Wright 1990;Lessios 2001), stirodonts (Smith & Wright 1990), camarodonts (Smith 1988;McCartney et al 2000;Jeffery et al 2003;Lee 2003;Lee et al 2004), primitive irregulars (Smith & Anzalone 2000;Solovjev & Markov 2004;Barras 2006Barras , 2007Saucède et al 2007), cassiduloids (Suter 1994;Smith 2001;Saucède & Néraudeau 2006), clypeasteroids (Marshall 1992;Mooi 1987;Wang 1994;Mooi & Peterson 2000;Mooi et al 2000), holasteroids (David 1988;Mooi & David 1996;Smith 2004) and spatangoids (Markov & Solovjev 2001;Villier et al 2004;Stockley et al 2005;Kroh 2007). All provide detailed snapshots of parts of the phylogenetic tree of echinoids.…”
Section: Previous Work On the Systematics Of Echinoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For our dataset, we used previously published mitochondrial 16s, 18s, and 28s small subunit rRNA sequence data (49)(50)(51), which comprises the most comprehensive known molecular dataset with respect to echinoid taxonomic sampling. Although such a dataset for inference of topology has limited use compared with more widely used phylogenomic datasets, we accounted for uncertainty in topology and branch length in our downstream ancestral state reconstructions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic classification used throughout this study is based upon results obtained by Jensen ( , 1988, , , Ax (2003), Smith (2005), Stockley et al (2005), and . Sea cucumbers (Holothuroidea) constitute the sister taxon to sea urchins, while Cidaroida are the most primitive taxon within the Echinoidea and sister taxon to Euechinoidea.…”
Section: Systematic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%