2010
DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1006.2010.01853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Relationships of Sugarcane Related Genera and Species Based on ITS Sequences of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result is obtained in the present study have shown that GC percentage is lower in ITS1 compare to ITS2 and also sequence length is longer in ITS-2 region than in ITS-1. A similar result was reported by [18,42], but in the present investigation, the variation sites found higher in ITS-2 region than ITS-1 as is observed in other plants [16,43]. The possible reason behind that the spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The result is obtained in the present study have shown that GC percentage is lower in ITS1 compare to ITS2 and also sequence length is longer in ITS-2 region than in ITS-1. A similar result was reported by [18,42], but in the present investigation, the variation sites found higher in ITS-2 region than ITS-1 as is observed in other plants [16,43]. The possible reason behind that the spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, our clusering analysis revealed that the accessions of the two species in each branch were mixed and without distinct boundaries. These findings were consistent with the phylogenetic trees of Miscanthus and related genera inferred from ITS sequences (Hodkinson et al 2002b, Chen et al 2007, Liu et al 2010), SSR markers (Ge et al 2017), SNPs (Clark et al 2014) and the dataset of genome size, ploidy level and genomic polymorphisms (Chae et al 2014). To summarise, our clustering results have demonstrated that there was a very close phylogenetic relationship between M. sinensis and M. floridulus , and between M. sacchariflorus and M. lutarioriparius and they cannot be distinguished only based on the ITS sequences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…So far, the phylogenetic relationships among the four Miscanthus species were mainly carried out at the morphological, cellular and molecular levels (Chae et al 2014, Yook et al 2014). In previous studies, the ITS sequence was used to assess the phylogeny of the four Miscanthus species and the species of the Saccharum complex and other related genera (Hodkinson et al 2002b, Chen et al 2007, Liu et al 2010), and the genome relationship between diploid M. sinensis and tetraploid M. sacchariflorus was examined by FISH with rDNA, genomic DNA and Saccharum centromeric repeats (Takahashi and Shibata 2002; Takahashi et al 2002). However, there has been no study on the phylogenetic relationships of all the four species by combining molecular cytogenetic characterization with ITS sequence analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports indicated that Erianthus belongs to Saccharum based on the presence/absence of awn whereas this is not exactly. The criteria to differentiate these two genera vary, but recent studies suggested that Saccharum and Erianthus are distinct genera based on various lines of molecular evidence [ 15 19 ]. As such, the Saccharum complex is broadly accepted to indicate the relationship between these species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%