2017
DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic relationships of the ‘higher heterostracans’ (Heterostraci: Pteraspidiformes and Cyathaspididae), extinct jawless vertebrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
99
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One segment of heterostracan diversity, the paraphyletic Cyathaspidiformes (41), first appear on the backreef and are preferentially found in reefal and deep lagoonal environments early, while the widespread, relatively robust and flattened genera Poraspis and Vernonaspis and some other late occurring forms shifted back to shore and freshwaters. In contrast, the other monophyletic division, the Pteraspidiformes (41), stay in the shallows and move into freshwater early, while a few later, streamlined lineages (including the Rhinopteraspis) make it to the shelf and open ocean ( Figs. 2A, S6; Additional Data File S1).…”
Section: Supplementary Text Fossil Record Summaries For Mid-paleozoicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One segment of heterostracan diversity, the paraphyletic Cyathaspidiformes (41), first appear on the backreef and are preferentially found in reefal and deep lagoonal environments early, while the widespread, relatively robust and flattened genera Poraspis and Vernonaspis and some other late occurring forms shifted back to shore and freshwaters. In contrast, the other monophyletic division, the Pteraspidiformes (41), stay in the shallows and move into freshwater early, while a few later, streamlined lineages (including the Rhinopteraspis) make it to the shelf and open ocean ( Figs. 2A, S6; Additional Data File S1).…”
Section: Supplementary Text Fossil Record Summaries For Mid-paleozoicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given different topologies for the same set of fossil taxa, stratigraphic congruence metrics can be used to support one solution or technique over another (e.g. [ 19 ]), but broader conclusions will be hard to draw from any one dataset. Here, we take a meta-analysis approach; we use a wide range of published morphological data matrices of crown-group tetrapods to compare maximum parsimony (equal and implied weights) and Bayesian (Mk) trees in terms of stratigraphic congruence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing and nature of these morphological diversifications is unclear, as is the best way to quantify the morphological variation. For example, the difficulty in taxonomic assignment and phylogenetic reconstruction of the Pteraspidiformes (the largest clade of heterostracan ostracoderms) can be attributed to the continuous variation in their dermal plates which is often used to discriminate between taxonomic grades ( Ilyes & Elliott, 1994 ; Pernègre, 2002 ; Pernègre & Goujet, 2007 ; Pernègre & Elliott, 2008 ; Randle & Sansom, 2017a ; Randle & Sansom, 2017b ). The Pteraspidiformes are characterised by possessing separate dorsal, ventral, rostral and pineal plates along with paired branchial, orbital and in some instances cornual plates ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pteraspidiformes are characterised by possessing separate dorsal, ventral, rostral and pineal plates along with paired branchial, orbital and in some instances cornual plates ( Fig. 1D ) ( Blieck, 1984 ; Blieck, Elliott & Gagnier, 1991 ; Janvier, 1996 ; Pernègre & Elliott, 2008 ; Randle & Sansom, 2017a ; Randle & Sansom, 2017b ). The Pteraspidiformes include many families and taxa of uncertain affinities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%