2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic relationships of the western North American cyprinid genus Richardsonius, with an overview of phylogeographic structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Posterior probabilities for each node were estimated using a majority rule consensus of the remaining topologies. Phylogenies were rooted to pearl dace (Margariscus margarita) because it is one of the most distant relatives of relict dace and speckled dace within the included outgroup taxa (see Estabrook et al 2007;Houston et al 2010a).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analyses and Population Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Posterior probabilities for each node were estimated using a majority rule consensus of the remaining topologies. Phylogenies were rooted to pearl dace (Margariscus margarita) because it is one of the most distant relatives of relict dace and speckled dace within the included outgroup taxa (see Estabrook et al 2007;Houston et al 2010a).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analyses and Population Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This vicariant diversification is overlain with dispersal events that coincide with more recent climatic or geological incidents (Smith 1981;Minckley et al 1986;Smith et al 2002;Oakey et al 2004;Houston et al 2010a). The diversity and distribution of fish fauna in western North America has more recently been influenced by anthropogenic activities (Frissell 1993;Williams et al 1996;Martin and Wilcox 2004;Schlyer 2007;Fausch et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BEAST analysis produced an estimated time of divergence between western and eastern clades that ranged between 2.5 and 3.1 million years ago (i.e., beginning of the Pleistocene to the late Pliocene), but a highest probability density distribution that ranged from 0.491 to 8.6 million years ago (i.e., late Pleistocene to late Miocene). Given that the current geographic distribution of the western and eastern clades overlaps with areas known to have acted as Pleistocene glacial refugia (e.g., Mississippi/Missouri and Atlantic, respectively), the divergence between these two lineages may have resulted from Pleistocene glaciations or perhaps by earlier climate-induced vicariant events in the Pliocene-Miocene [20,21]. These divergence time estimates are not inconsistent with values obtained using a range of molecular clock sequence divergence estimates for cytochrome b of about 1.4-2.4% per million years derived for other cyprinid fishes (e.g., [21]), i.e., estimates of divergence between 1.6 and 2.7 million years ago.…”
Section: Designatable Units In Lake Chubmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the current geographic distribution of the western and eastern clades overlaps with areas known to have acted as Pleistocene glacial refugia (e.g., Mississippi/Missouri and Atlantic, respectively), the divergence between these two lineages may have resulted from Pleistocene glaciations or perhaps by earlier climate-induced vicariant events in the Pliocene-Miocene [20,21]. These divergence time estimates are not inconsistent with values obtained using a range of molecular clock sequence divergence estimates for cytochrome b of about 1.4-2.4% per million years derived for other cyprinid fishes (e.g., [21]), i.e., estimates of divergence between 1.6 and 2.7 million years ago. Although all such estimates are subject to assumptions, are uncertain, and we cannot necessarily tie them to specific vicariant events that impacted lake chub, our results do imply that the divergence is a relatively ancient, pre-Wisconsinan one, and thus it satisfies the evolutionary -significance‖ criterion for DU recognition [9].…”
Section: Designatable Units In Lake Chubmentioning
confidence: 99%