1989
DOI: 10.2307/1445425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Relationships of Trachinoid Fishes of the Family Uranoscopidae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Watson et al (1984) included champsodontids and chiasmodontids in the Trachinoidei, but concluded that the suborder was probably polyphyletic and did not comment specifically on champsodontid relationships. Pietsch (1989) provided the first cladistic analysis of the Trachinoidei while attempting to establish outgroup relationships for a study of the Uranoscopidae. Ten families were included in his phylogeny, which proposed a sister group relationship of Champsodontidae and Chiasmodontidae embedded within the middle of the group.…”
Section: Historical Review Of Champsodontid Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Watson et al (1984) included champsodontids and chiasmodontids in the Trachinoidei, but concluded that the suborder was probably polyphyletic and did not comment specifically on champsodontid relationships. Pietsch (1989) provided the first cladistic analysis of the Trachinoidei while attempting to establish outgroup relationships for a study of the Uranoscopidae. Ten families were included in his phylogeny, which proposed a sister group relationship of Champsodontidae and Chiasmodontidae embedded within the middle of the group.…”
Section: Historical Review Of Champsodontid Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical re-evaluation of Pietsch and Zabetian's evidence by Johnson (1993) suggested that the Trachinoidei sensu Pietsch and Zabetian was not adequately diagnose& and noted that several, often informative, character complexes had not been considered. Given that these complexes exhibit morphological variation among the trachinoids, their inclusion would have considerably altered the conclusions of Pietsch (1989) and Pietsch and Zabetian (1990). Johnson (1993: 14) specifically questioned the champsodontid/chiasmodontid relationship, citing a number of trenchant differences in morphology of the dorsal-fin pterygiophores and gill arches.…”
Section: Historical Review Of Champsodontid Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations