Phylogenetic signal in the acoustic parameters of the advertisement calls of four clades of anurans

Abstract

BackgroundAnuran vocalizations, especially their advertisement calls, are largely species-specific and can be used to identify taxonomic affiliations. Because anurans are not vocal learners, their vocalizations are generally assumed to have a strong genetic component. This suggests that the degree of similarity between advertisement calls may be related to large-scale phylogenetic relationships. To test this hypothesis, advertisement calls from 90 species belonging to four large clades (Bufo, Hylinae, Leptodactylus, and Rana) were analyzed. Phylogenetic distances were estimated based on the DNA sequences of the 12S mitochondrial ribosomal RNA gene, and, for a subset of 49 species, on the rhodopsin gene. Mean values for five acoustic parameters (coefficient of variation of root-mean-square amplitude, dominant frequency, spectral flux, spectral irregularity, and spectral flatness) were computed for each species. We then tested for phylogenetic signal on the body-size-corrected residuals of these five parameters, using three statistical tests (Moran’s I, Mantel, and Blomberg’s K) and three models of genetic distance (pairwise distances, Abouheif’s proximities, and the variance-covariance matrix derived from the phylogenetic tree).ResultsA significant phylogenetic signal was detected for most acoustic parameters on the 12S dataset, across statistical tests and genetic distance models, both for the entire sample of 90 species and within clades in several cases. A further analysis on a subset of 49 species using genetic distances derived from rhodopsin and from 12S broadly confirmed the results obtained on the larger sample, indicating that the phylogenetic signals observed in these acoustic parameters can be detected using a variety of genetic distance models derived either from a variable mitochondrial sequence or from a conserved nuclear gene.ConclusionsWe found a robust relationship, in a large number of species, between anuran phylogenetic relatedness and acoustic similarity in the advertisement calls in a taxon with no evidence for vocal learning, even after correcting for the effect of body size. This finding, covering a broad sample of species whose vocalizations are fairly diverse, indicates that the intense selection on certain call characteristics observed in many anurans does not eliminate all acoustic indicators of relatedness. Our approach could potentially be applied to other vocal taxa.

How the environment shapes animal signals: a test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in frogs

“…() and Gingras et al . () found a phylogenetic signal within the calls of other anuran groups. Robillard et al .…”

“…In torrent habitats, the noise of flowing water masks low‐frequency vocalizations (usually below 2 kHz), and most anurans call below 5 kHz (e.g. Hoskin et al ., ; Gingras et al ., ,; Goutte et al ., ). Many anuran calls are therefore masked by torrent noise (Dubois, ,).…”

Heterogeneous tempo and mode of evolutionary diversification of compounds in lizard chemical signals

“…However, the overwhelming majority of such studies have been focused on visual and acoustic signals (Gingras, Mohandesan, Boko, & Fitch, 2013; Huang & Rabosky, 2014; Santana, Alfaro, Noonan, & Alfaro, 2013; Wilkins, Seddon, & Safran, 2013). In contrast, comparative studies of chemical signals remain fundamentally ignored in most groups of organism (Kather & Martin, 2015; Symonds & Elgar, 2008).…”

Interspecific variation of warning calls in piranhas: a comparative analysis

“…Several examples demonstrating divergence in acoustic signals between closely-related species can be found in different sound-producing taxa such as arthropods23, anurans456, birds78 and mammals910. These differences would correspond to adaptations to different constraints and could help interspecies discrimination, preventing interbreeding.…”