Phylogenetics of Coenonymphina (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) and the problem of rooting rapid radiations

Kodandaramaiah, Ullasa; Peña, Carlos; Braby, Michael F.; Grund, Roger; Müller, Christopher John; Nylin, Sören; Wahlberg, Niklas

doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.08.012

Cited by 38 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This clade is recovered in various phylogenetic studies (Peña et al 2006, Peña & Wahlberg 2008, Wahlberg et al 2009 with partially resolved relationships and only supported by molecular characters (Fig 2) [ (Peña et al 2006, Peña & Wahlberg 2008 The lack of resolution in the topology of Satyrini is This phenomenon occurs in most of the subtribes of Satyrini (Peña et al 2011) and has been recently reported in Coenonymphina (Kodandaramaiah et al 2010a), Euptychiina (Peña et al 2010) and Mycalesina (Kodandaramaiah et al 2010b). Peña et al (2011) ind that the initial selection of Haeterini as outgroup for Satyrini produces unstable trees where Euptychia (Euptychiina) appears outside of Satyrini.…”

Section: Evoluti Onary Relati Onships Within Satyrinaementioning

confidence: 91%

“…In a study on Coenonymphina, Kodandaramaiah et al (2010a) established that the ingroup relationships can be affected by changes in sampling density in combination with the outgroup taxa selected, inding that the effect of the outgroup is more pronounced in the basal nodes (Kodandaramaiah et al 2010a, Peña et al 2011. Thus, proper selection of outgroups can reduce the traction between them and the genera near the basal nodes, allowing to recover the monophyly of the group.…”

Section: Evoluti Onary Relati Onships Within Satyrinaementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

From the Phylogeny of the Satyrinae Butterflies to the Systematics of Euptychiina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): History, Progress and Prospects

Marin¹,

Peña²,

Freitas³

et al. 2011

Neotrop. entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We review the various proposals of evolutionary and classi ication schemes for Satyrinae and particularly Euptychiina butter lies, assessing progress and prospects of research for the group. Among the highlights is the proposal to include Morphini, Brassolini and Amathusiini as part of Satyrinae. Although it is clear that this hypothesis requires further investigation, phylogenetic studies recently conducted recover this clade as part of Satyrinae with high support. The phylogenetic analyses for Euptychiina carried out to date recover the monophyly of the group and have identi ied a variety of genera as non-monophyletic. Further work is necessary to resolve the position of the subtribe and the evolutionary relationships of several genera.

show abstract

Section: Evoluti Onary Relati Onships Within Satyrinaementioning

confidence: 91%

Section: Evoluti Onary Relati Onships Within Satyrinaementioning

confidence: 99%

From the Phylogeny of the Satyrinae Butterflies to the Systematics of Euptychiina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): History, Progress and Prospects

Marin¹,

Peña²,

Freitas³

et al. 2011

Neotrop. entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Further studies should focus on testing the hard polytomy hypotheses in Scolytinae which imply that deeper nodes might be intrinsically difficult to resolve even with considerable data accumulation. On the contrary, phylogenetic studies in other insect taxa have confirmed that the addition of a handful of new nuclear genes increased both resolution and node support in phylogenetic trees, often solving polytomies that were previously present due to low amount of data (Kodandaramaiah et al, 2010, Ruiz et al, 2009. With all these considerations, the question is: why are Scolytinae so difficult to resolve phylogenetically using 16 markers?…”

Section: The General Resolution Within Tribes Increased As Well Somementioning

confidence: 99%

Molecular phylogeny of bark and ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) based on 18 molecular markers

Pistone

Gohli

Jordal

2017

Systematic Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In their second paper dealing with Coenonympha phylogeny, they followed this synonymisation (Kodandaramaiah et al, 2010). On the other hand, the synonymisation was rejected by many lepidopterists (V.V.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of the Genus Triphysa Zeller, 1858 (Lepidoptera, Satyridae)

Дубатолов¹,

Korb²,

Yakovlev³

2016

Biol. Bull. of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol St. Pedag. Univ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A review of the genus Triphysa Zeller, 1858 is presented. One new species Triphysa issykkulica sp.n. (type locality: Kazakhstan, W of Almaty, 800 m) and 8 new subspecies are described: Triphysa phryne kasikoporana ssp. n. (type locality: Kasikoporan [NE Turkey, Agri prov.]), Triphysa striatula urumtchiensis ssp. n. (type locality: Urumtchi), Triphysa issykkulica pljustchi ssp. n. (type locality: W. Kirgiziya, Talasskii Mts., Manas), Triphysa nervosa tuvinica ssp. n. (type locality: N. Tuva, near Kyzyl, Tuge Mt.), Triphysa nervosa arturi ssp. n. (type locality: S. Tuva, 15 km WSW Erzin), Triphysa nervosa kobdoensis ssp. n. (type locality: W. Mongolia, Hovd aimak, 15 km S Khara-Us-Nuur lake, 1300 m), Triphysa nervosa mongolaltaica ssp. n. (type locality: Mongolia, Hovd aimak, Bulgan-Gol basin, middle stream of Ulyasutai-Gol river, 2500−3000 m) and Triphysa nervosa brinikhi ssp. n. (type locality: Russia, Chita Reg., Onon distr., 18 km WSW Nizhniy Zasuchey vill., Butyvken lake, Pinus forest, steppe) are described. New status for Triphysa striatula Elwes, 1899, stat. n. is established. The lectotypes of Triphysa nervosa gartoki O.Bang-Haas, 1927, Triphysa phryne kintschouensis O. Bang-Haas, 1939, Triphysa phryne biocellata Staudinger, 1901, Triphysa nervosa tscherski Grum-Grshimailo, 1899 [1900], Triphysa nervosa glacialis A. Bang-Haas, 1912 are designated, the neotype of T. dohrnii Zeller, 1850 (type locality: [Russia], Sarepta) is designated.

show abstract

Phylogenetics of Coenonymphina (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) and the problem of rooting rapid radiations

Cited by 38 publications

References 63 publications

From the Phylogeny of the Satyrinae Butterflies to the Systematics of Euptychiina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): History, Progress and Prospects

From the Phylogeny of the Satyrinae Butterflies to the Systematics of Euptychiina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): History, Progress and Prospects

Molecular phylogeny of bark and ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) based on 18 molecular markers

A Review of the Genus Triphysa Zeller, 1858 (Lepidoptera, Satyridae)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About