2022
DOI: 10.1002/yea.3812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenies in yeast species descriptions: In defense of neighbor‐joining

Abstract: The neighbor-joining (NJ) method of tree inference is examined, with special attention to its use in yeast species descriptions. How the often-vilified method works is often misunderstood. More importantly, given the right kind of data, its output is a phylogram that illustrates a hypothetical phylogeny that is just as credible as that obtained by any other method. And as with any other method, the result is greatly affected by sampling intensity, particularly the number of aligned positions used for analysis.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A neighbour-joining phylogram based on D1/D2 sequences was reconstructed with mega 6 from an alignment of 558 positions. The distance metric was the number of substitutions, calculated pairwise [22]. Bootstrap values were determined from 1000 pseudoreplications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A neighbour-joining phylogram based on D1/D2 sequences was reconstructed with mega 6 from an alignment of 558 positions. The distance metric was the number of substitutions, calculated pairwise [22]. Bootstrap values were determined from 1000 pseudoreplications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mention forma asexualis (f.a.) is added as a reminder that the sexual state is not known [31]. Isolates UFMG-CM-Y6355 and UFMG-CM-Y7245 presented identical ITS 5.8S and D1/D2 sequences and were phylogenetically related to T. aglyptinius .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequences of closely related strains or species were retrieved from GenBank and were aligned using CLUSTAL_X version 1.81 (Thompson, 1997). Phylogenetic analyses were performed based on the evolutionary distance data calculated from Kimura's two‐parameter model (Kimura, 1980) using the neighbor‐joining algorithm executed in MEGA v.7 (Kumar et al, 2016; Lachance, 2022; Saitou & Nei, 1987). The confidence levels of the clades were estimated through bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates (Felsenstein, 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic analyses were performed based on the evolutionary distance data calculated from Kimura's two-parameter model (Kimura, 1980) using the neighbor-joining algorithm executed in MEGA v.7 (Kumar et al, 2016;Lachance, 2022;Saitou & Nei, 1987).…”
Section: Dna Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%