2024
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03980-23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenomics reveals extensive misidentification of fungal strains from the genus Aspergillus

Jacob L. Steenwyk,
Charu Balamurugan,
Huzefa A. Raja
et al.

Abstract: Modern taxonomic classification is often based on phylogenetic analyses of a few molecular markers, although single-gene studies are still common. Here, we leverage genome-scale molecular phylogenetics (phylogenomics) of species and populations to reconstruct evolutionary relationships in a dense data set of 710 fungal genomes from the biomedically and technologically important genus Aspergillus . To do so, we generated a novel set of 1,362 high-quality molecular markers specific fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Phylogeny of the 263 A. fumigatus strains used in this study. A phylogenetic tree of the 263 A. fumigatus strains used in this study was generated by pruning from a larger Aspergillus species tree inferred from analyses of 1,362 protein-coding regions ( Steenwyk et al . 2024 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Phylogeny of the 263 A. fumigatus strains used in this study. A phylogenetic tree of the 263 A. fumigatus strains used in this study was generated by pruning from a larger Aspergillus species tree inferred from analyses of 1,362 protein-coding regions ( Steenwyk et al . 2024 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A phylogenetic tree of the 265 strains used in this study ( Fig. 1 ) was generated by pruning from a larger Aspergillus species phylogeny ( Steenwyk et al . 2024 ) using the Treehouse software in R using default parameters ( Steenwyk and Rokas 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%