2008
DOI: 10.2992/0097-4463-77.1.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny and classification of Hypherpes auctorum (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Pterostichini: Pterostichus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we will discuss whether the results of the phylogeographic analysis are consistent with the assumption of a Tibetan origin for the Ethira clade. In performing this work, we benefited greatly from the previous studies carried out by Sasakawa & Kubota [27] , [28] and of Will & Gill [29] , who studied several other Pterostichini ground beetle groups, thus providing a comprehensive set of DNA sequences for comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we will discuss whether the results of the phylogeographic analysis are consistent with the assumption of a Tibetan origin for the Ethira clade. In performing this work, we benefited greatly from the previous studies carried out by Sasakawa & Kubota [27] , [28] and of Will & Gill [29] , who studied several other Pterostichini ground beetle groups, thus providing a comprehensive set of DNA sequences for comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on DNA analysis, a recent phylogeny supports Anilloferonia (comprised of P. lanei, P. malkini, and P. testacea) as a valid subgenus (Will and Gill 2008). This same paper concludes that P. rothi is actually a member of the subgenus Leptoferonia Casey, 1918.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The tree’s shape is predominately derived from large-scale molecular studies of ground beetle phylogeny (Maddison etal., 1999; 2009; Ober, 2002; Ober and Maddison, 2008). Additional molecular phylogenetic studies provided support for relationships in the following clades: Carabinae (Osawa et al, 2004), Cicindelinae (Vogler and Pearson, 1996; Gough et al, 2018), Harpalini (Martinez-Navarro et al, 2005), Paussinae (Moore, 2008; Robertson and Moore, 2016), Pterostichini and allies (Will and Gill, 2008), and Trechinae (Maddison and Ober, 2011; Maddison et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%