1999
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1999.0667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny and Evolution of the Drosophila nasuta Subgroup Based on Mitochondrial ND4 and ND4L Gene Sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high A+T content of all the three mitochondrial genes in the species studied agrees with the earlier reports on other insects including Drosophila (Clary and Wolstenholme, 1985;Yu et al, 1999;Crozier and Crozier, 1993;Mitchell et al, 1993). However, our results show that the A+T bias is relatively low in CoI gene as compared to 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA reported in the present study and ND4 and ND4L mitochondrial genes (Yu et al, 1999).…”
Section: Rapd Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The high A+T content of all the three mitochondrial genes in the species studied agrees with the earlier reports on other insects including Drosophila (Clary and Wolstenholme, 1985;Yu et al, 1999;Crozier and Crozier, 1993;Mitchell et al, 1993). However, our results show that the A+T bias is relatively low in CoI gene as compared to 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA reported in the present study and ND4 and ND4L mitochondrial genes (Yu et al, 1999).…”
Section: Rapd Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, our results show that the A+T bias is relatively low in CoI gene as compared to 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA reported in the present study and ND4 and ND4L mitochondrial genes (Yu et al, 1999). The transition bias observed in 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA and CoI sequences is consistent with the mitochondrial DNA of other Drosophila species (Tamura, 1992;Moriyama and Powell, 1997).…”
Section: Rapd Analysissupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, D. americana neo-Y chromosomes show no evidence for any degeneration, consistent with a much more recent origin and incomplete isolation from the neo-X (Charlesworth et al, 1997). The same appears to be true of the neo-Y of D. albomicans (D Bachtrog, unpublished data), which is so closely related to D. nasuta that sequence divergence is minimal (Yu et al, 1999b). It is thus clear that a Y chromosome can partially degenerate in fewer than several million generations, as predicted by population genetic models of large nonrecombining genomic regions .…”
Section: The Time Scale Of Genetic Degenerationmentioning
confidence: 78%