2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny and polyploidy: Resolving the classification of cyprinine fishes (Teleostei: Cypriniformes)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

28
318
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(349 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
28
318
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the morphological grouping of the schizothoracins had been challenged by recent molecular evidences (Li et al, 2008;Yang et al, 2015a;Yonezawa et al, 2014). The present phylogeny revealed two independent origins of these Tibetan Plateau endemic polyploid cyprinids, migrating independently of each other to the Tibetan Plateau and adapted to high altitude (Yonezawa et al, 2014).…”
Section: Biogeographic Patterns and Ploidy Levels In The Cyprininaementioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, the morphological grouping of the schizothoracins had been challenged by recent molecular evidences (Li et al, 2008;Yang et al, 2015a;Yonezawa et al, 2014). The present phylogeny revealed two independent origins of these Tibetan Plateau endemic polyploid cyprinids, migrating independently of each other to the Tibetan Plateau and adapted to high altitude (Yonezawa et al, 2014).…”
Section: Biogeographic Patterns and Ploidy Levels In The Cyprininaementioning
confidence: 75%
“…At this time, the inter-familial relationships within the order are reaching consensus (Yang et al 2015). Higher level intra-family relationships within the Cyprinidae, one of the largest and most complex vertebrate families in existence, have also received attention (Shunping et al 2008;Wang et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially relevant because, as reflected in the genera of both aforementioned species, the name Barbus, formally attributed to many African species, now has been restricted to a lineage of European species. The many African species that were formally part of this genus have been dispersed into different genera or left in a basket of unclassified 'Barbus' following the findings of Berrebi et al (1996Berrebi et al ( , 2014, Machordom & Doadrio (2001), Tsigenopoulos et al (2002Tsigenopoulos et al ( , 2010 and Yang et al (2015). The taxonomic recommendations made by Yang et al (2015) with regard to a lineage of tetraploid species from southern Africa, including species of the genus Pseudobarbus, was to place all species other than Pseudobarbus in a temporary genus 'Pseudobarbus'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, however, Yang et al (2015) have proposed the resurrection of the oldest available genus name, Enteromius, for these African "small barbs, " and some authors have adopted that proposal (e.g., Decru et al, 2015). While Yang et al 's (2015) study represents progress toward resolution of tribal-level relationships among the more the 1300 species of the subfamily Cyprininae, their sampling of African members of the newly erected tribe Smiliogastrini (viz., all African small barbs and their allies, and most members of the Asian genus Puntius and allies) was limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And, as noted by Schmidt and Bart (2015), the current lack of resolution of relationships within the tribe renders the adoption of the name Enteromius for the numerous small-bodied African barbs problematical. If classification and nomenclature are to reflect phylogenetic relationships and monophyly is to prevail then, based on the trees presented by Yang et al (2015), certain putatively monophyletic genera such as Barboides and Clypeobarbus will either need to be sunk into Enteromius, or various Enteromius species will need to be reassigned to Barboides and Clypeobarbus. In the absence of a well-supported tree that includes considerably more African taxa, such action appears premature and likely to cause considerable nomenclatural instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%