2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny, biogeography, and character evolution of the genus Sophora s.l. (Fabaceae, Papilionoideae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cypripedium (Fatihah et al, 2011;Liao et al, 2024;H Liu et al, 2021a), as suggested by SC Chen et al (2013). Moreover, the species composition of the two clades within sect.…”
Section: Historical Biogeographymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cypripedium (Fatihah et al, 2011;Liao et al, 2024;H Liu et al, 2021a), as suggested by SC Chen et al (2013). Moreover, the species composition of the two clades within sect.…”
Section: Historical Biogeographymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…After the publication of J Li et al (2011), several studies included molecular phylogenies with Cypripedium species, five of which investigated the relationships of the infrageneric taxa of Cypripedium in detail (Fatihah et al, 2011;Guo et al, 2012;Liao et al, 2024;H Liu et al, 2021a;Pérez-Escobar et al, 2023;Szlachetko et al, 2021;J-Y Zhang et al, 2022). These studies employed different phylogenetic reconstruction methodologies (i.e., Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood, and Bayesian Inference) with most using up to eight Sanger-sequenced nuclear and chloroplast DNA markers in different combinations, while the most recent study used plastome data and 41 nuclear loci derived from transcriptomes (Liao et al, 2024). The topologies and the monophyly of some subgeneric taxa were congruent among the produced phylogenies (e.g., sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with genomic data, DNA barcodes, such as trnL-F , rbcL , matK , trnK-matK , psbA-trnH , ITS, and ETS, are more readily available and can still be used to solve many taxonomic problems. Among these, ITS and ETS are important nrDNA markers that are widely used in phylogenetic studies ( Kuzmanović et al., 2017 ; Vicent et al., 2017 ; Zhou and Zhang, 2017 ; Carrizo García et al., 2018 ; Asanuma et al., 2019 ; Pirani et al., 2020 ; Tan et al., 2020 ; Hashim et al., 2021 ; Liao et al., 2023 ). ITS and ETS are effective in discriminating closely related species because of their rapid evolutionary rates and higher interspecies variation ( Li et al., 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A taxonomy-based phylogenetic tree serves as the foundation for biodiversity conservation and offers guidelines for mining and utilizing germplasm resources in horticulture and agriculture. Previous plant phylogenetic studies primarily relied on Sanger sequencing, utilizing specific region markers, such as ITS, ETS, rbcL, atpB, matK, and trnL-trnF (Shi et al 2013;Zhao et al 2016;Liao et al 2023;Phang et al 2023). However, these markers have inherent limitations, including short lengths (usually <1000 base pairs (bp)), high homogeneity (e.g., plastid loci), or gene paralogs (e.g., ITS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%