2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny, character evolution, and biogeography of the fern genus Bolbitis (Dryopteridaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous phylogenetic study, the B. sinensis species complex formed a well-supported group within the Heteroclitae subclade. The MRCA of the B. sinensis species complex likely originated in subtropical to tropical Asia and diverged around 3.84 Mya [16]. Notably, within the Heteroclitae subclade, the B. sinensis species complex and another two species (B. major and B. tonkinensis) with free venation in common are not resolved as monophyletic, whereas other species with anastomosing veins are monophyletic [16].…”
Section: Reclassification Of Bolbitis Sinensis Species Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous phylogenetic study, the B. sinensis species complex formed a well-supported group within the Heteroclitae subclade. The MRCA of the B. sinensis species complex likely originated in subtropical to tropical Asia and diverged around 3.84 Mya [16]. Notably, within the Heteroclitae subclade, the B. sinensis species complex and another two species (B. major and B. tonkinensis) with free venation in common are not resolved as monophyletic, whereas other species with anastomosing veins are monophyletic [16].…”
Section: Reclassification Of Bolbitis Sinensis Species Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MRCA of the B. sinensis species complex likely originated in subtropical to tropical Asia and diverged around 3.84 Mya [16]. Notably, within the Heteroclitae subclade, the B. sinensis species complex and another two species (B. major and B. tonkinensis) with free venation in common are not resolved as monophyletic, whereas other species with anastomosing veins are monophyletic [16]. Hence, this raises several questions: Do the variable individuals in the B. sinensis species complex belong to one species or to different species?…”
Section: Reclassification Of Bolbitis Sinensis Species Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[wrong number of species, Dryopteris comprises 400 spp.]”. This is less relevant, as these genera each are morphologically quite homogeneous and their species diversity is mainly the result of relatively young radiations ( Asplenium : Xu & al., 2020; Du & al., 2021; Dryopteris : Sessa & al., 2012; Li‐Bing Zhang & al., 2012; Elaphoglossum : Moran & al., 2010; Nie & al., 2022; Hymenophyllum : Rio & al., 2017; Polystichum : Le Péchon & al., 2016a,b; McHenry & Barrington, 2017; Pteris : Liang Zhang & al., 2015; Liang Zhang & Zhang, 2018), as opposed to ancient divergences in Selaginellaceae (85–370 million years ago; Klaus & al., 2017).…”
Section: Rebuttal To Valdespino and Al's Rebuttalmentioning
confidence: 99%