2018
DOI: 10.13102/sociobiology.v65i2.2099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny of the ant genus Aphaenogaster (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Iberian Peninsula, with the description of a new species

Abstract: A phylogenetic tree of the Iberian Aphaenogaster species - except for A. splendida (Roger) - and a key to the worker caste of all Iberian Aphaenogaster species are proposed. The position of A. striativentris Forel and A. cardenai Espadaler is discussed, stating the possibility that this second species may belong to a new, undescribed genus. Aphaenogaster ulibeli n. sp. is described from the Iberian Peninsula. Its closest relatives are A. gibbosa (Latreille) and A. striativentris. Its habitat seems to be restri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…striativentris Forel, 1895(see TINAUT & JIMÉNEZ ROJAS 1990; Antweb specimen KG00801), A. mauritanica Dalla Torre, 1893(see SANT SCHI 1932, CAGNIANT 1987 differences between the drawings of the two authors), A. nadigi Santschi, 1923(see CAGNIANT 1987. The male of the recently described A. ulibeli Gómez & Espadaler, 2018 is also known (GÓMEZ et al 2018). Some differences between males of these species may be worth a more detailed evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…striativentris Forel, 1895(see TINAUT & JIMÉNEZ ROJAS 1990; Antweb specimen KG00801), A. mauritanica Dalla Torre, 1893(see SANT SCHI 1932, CAGNIANT 1987 differences between the drawings of the two authors), A. nadigi Santschi, 1923(see CAGNIANT 1987. The male of the recently described A. ulibeli Gómez & Espadaler, 2018 is also known (GÓMEZ et al 2018). Some differences between males of these species may be worth a more detailed evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It comprises A. cardenai Espadaler, 1981, A. muelleriana Wolf, 1915, A. ovaticeps (Emery, 1898, A. rugosoferruginea Forel, 1889, A. splendida and A. strioloides, but striking differences emerge when comparing the males of A. splendida (see EMERY 1908), A. cardenai (see TINAUT 1986), and A. strioloides (see SANTSCHI 1923). It is to be noted that recently A. cardenai has even been suspected to belong to another unrecognized genus rather than to Aphaenogaster (GÓMEZ et al 2018). Male morphology was also overlooked in the comparisons proposed by SCHULZ (1994) when describing A. graeca Schulz, 1994, and further examples could probably be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Aphaenogaster Mayr, 1853 is a worldwide genus, which includes 226 species and subspecies. Among them, 128 species and subspecies are known from the Palearctic Region (Bolton 2018) and 43 from Europe (Borowiec 2014, Borowiec and Salata 2014, 2018, Salata and Borowiec 2016, Borowiec et al 2019, Gómez et al 2018). Schulz (1994) proposed the division of some west Palearctic taxa of Aphaenogaster into species groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%