2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01232.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny recapitulates geography, or why New Zealand has so many species of skinks

Abstract: The evolutionary history of 25 New Zealand scincid lizards in the endemic genera Oligosoma and Cyclodina was examined using 12s rRNA sequence data. Phylogenetic resolution was poor, despite there being up to 9% sequence divergence between taxa. Lack of resolution was not attributable to biases in the data, such as site saturation or differences in sites free to vary, so we infer that New Zealand skinks underwent two relatively rapid phases of divergence. The rate of substitution for the skink sequences appears… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…our morphological and mitochondrial sequence data for the "Mokohinau" skink are concordant with previous mitochondrial DNa (hay 1988;hickson et al 2000) and allozyme data (vos 1988; ChD unpubl. data), supporting our description of this taxon as C. townsi.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…our morphological and mitochondrial sequence data for the "Mokohinau" skink are concordant with previous mitochondrial DNa (hay 1988;hickson et al 2000) and allozyme data (vos 1988; ChD unpubl. data), supporting our description of this taxon as C. townsi.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…They provide the first minimum age constraints for the divergence of the endemic NZ scincid and gekkotan clades from their extralimital sister groups (Chapple et al 2009). Molecular divergence dating using other calibration points has thus far yielded highly disparate dates for the age of NZ skinks, suggesting that they diverged from New Caledonian relatives 20 Myr ago (Hickson et al 2000) or either 22.9 -19.9 or 7.9 Myr ago, depending on calibrations and genes employed (Smith et al 2007). For geckos, the only study suggests NZ geckos diverged from (primarily) New Caledonian relatives about 30 Myr ago (Chambers et al 2001; see §1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumazawa 2007), this extrapolation would underestimate (by half) divergence dates within skinks. Thus, the deeper molecular estimates for NZ skink origins (more than 20 Myr ago: Hickson et al 2000;Chapple et al 2009) are best supported by the fossil record, phylogeography and methodological considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Throughout the late Cretaceous and early Tertiary steady erosion and marine transgression reduced both the extent and topology of New Zealand's landscape, so that during the late Oligocene-early Miocene only a scattered archipelago of low-lying islands remained. Several authors have highlighted the possible substantive extinction and genetic bottlenecks faced by the flora and fauna resident at that time (Cooper and Cooper, 1995;Cooper, 1998;Hickson et al, 2000), although Lee et al (2001) point out that the extent of land at the height of the Oligocene transgression was still considerable at around 20,000 km 2 and that there is no evidence in angiosperms of significant biotic loss.…”
Section: The Context: New Zealand As Anmentioning
confidence: 99%