2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeography and DNA-based species delimitation provide insight into the taxonomy of the polymorphic rose chafer Protaetia (Potosia) cuprea species complex (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) in the Western Palearctic

Abstract: The development of modern methods of species delimitation, unified under the “integrated taxonomy” approach, allows a critical examination and re-evaluation of complex taxonomic groups. The rose chafer Protaetia (Potosia) cuprea is a highly polymorphic species group with a large distribution range. Despite its overall commonness, its taxonomy is unclear and subject to conflicting hypotheses, most of which largely fail to account for its evolutionary history. Based on the sequences of two mitochondrial markers … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the complex of Protaetia cuprea-a well-studied European flower beetle taxon-P. metallica is a morphologically, geographically and biologically recognized distinct species (Tauzin, 2015). Here, we found however a low genetic divergence between P. metallica and other representatives of P. cuprea (different subspecies were sampled in this study: P. cuprea cuprea, P. cuprea olivacea, P cuprea bourgini), which is consistent with what was previously highlighted in Rougerie et al (2015) and more recently in Vondráček et al (2018) from both COI and CytB markers. The later authors actually questioned the specific status of P. metallica.…”
Section: Dna Barcode Reference Libraries Of Saproxylic Beetles and Insupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the complex of Protaetia cuprea-a well-studied European flower beetle taxon-P. metallica is a morphologically, geographically and biologically recognized distinct species (Tauzin, 2015). Here, we found however a low genetic divergence between P. metallica and other representatives of P. cuprea (different subspecies were sampled in this study: P. cuprea cuprea, P. cuprea olivacea, P cuprea bourgini), which is consistent with what was previously highlighted in Rougerie et al (2015) and more recently in Vondráček et al (2018) from both COI and CytB markers. The later authors actually questioned the specific status of P. metallica.…”
Section: Dna Barcode Reference Libraries Of Saproxylic Beetles and Insupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Partial sequences of the mitochondrial protein coding gene cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (Cox1) were used in the study. For a detailed description of the laboratory protocol see Vondráček et al (2018). The larval sequences proved to be identical to those of the adults (100% match).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For details about the laboratory protocols, follow Vondráček, Tkoč et al (2018), including primers and PCR protocol for the barcode region. For the amplification details of the 3' region of cox1, follow Vondráček, Fuchsová et al (2018). Obtained sequences of the 3' region of cox1 were submitted to the GenBank (NCBI) under the accession numbers given in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%