the impacts invasive species have on biodiversity and ecosystem function globally have been linked to the higher abundances they often obtain in their introduced compared to native ranges. Higher abundances of invaders in the introduced range are often explained by a reduction in negative species interactions in that range, although results are equivocal. The role of positive interactions in explaining differences in the abundance of invaders between native and invasive ranges has not been tested. Using biogeographic surveys, we showed that the rocky shore porcelain crab, Petrolisthes elongatus, was ~4 times more abundant in its introduced (Tasmania, Australia) compared to its native (New Zealand) range. The habitat of these crabs in the invaded range (underside of intertidal boulders) was extensively covered with the habitat-forming tubeworm Galeolaria caespitosa. We tested whether the habitat provided by the tubeworm facilitates a higher abundance of the invasive crab by creating mimics of boulders with and without the tubeworm physical structure and measured crab colonisation into these habitats at three sites in both Tasmania and New Zealand. Adding the tubeworm structure increased crab abundance by an average of 85% across all sites in both ranges. Our intercontinental biogeographic survey and experiment demonstrate that native species can facilitate invader abundance and that positive interactions can be important drivers of invasion success. Historically, the processes structuring ecological communities have been viewed through the lens of negative biotic interactions. Understanding the ecology of species invasions has developed along parallel lines. For example, the impacts of invasive species on native biota via competition and predation are well documented 1,2 and changes in these negative interactions are also important drivers of invader abundances at biogeographic scales 3. The loss of natural enemies (e.g. parasites, pathogens and predators 4-6); and the evolution of increased competitive ability 7-9 can explain higher abundances of invaders in their introduced compared to the native range. The past 20 years, however, have seen positive interactions as an emerging paradigm for structuring ecological communities 10-14 and, in fact, positive interactions have as strong effects on community structure as better studied negative interactions 15. In relatively few instances, positive interactions between native and invasive species 16-18 and co-occurring invasive species 19,20 can determine invader abundance in their introduced range but none of these studies have tested if and how facilitation may also affect the invasive species in its native range. Whether changes in positive interactions at biogeographic scales increase invader abundances in their introduced compared to native range has not been tested. Whilst the enemies left behind in native ranges can lead to increases in abundance of invaders in introduced ranges, the native species in the introduce range can also increase invader abundances. For ...