“…Thus, various studies have focused on species that are ecologically minor components of EBLF or failed to cover geographical key areas such as those adjacent to the current southern EBLF boundary (Li, Yan, & Ge, 2012;Tian et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2015); their results may therefore not be representative for the biome as a whole. On the other hand, most studies of major or widely distributed EBLF species have to date only used cytoplasmatic markers (Sun, Hu, Huang, & Vargas-Mendoza, 2014;Tian et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2015;Fan et al, 2016; but see Shi et al, 2014); their results do hence not provide any insights into important processes such as pollen-mediated gene flow and secondary admixture. As a result, we still ignore many aspects of past population and range dynamics in subtropical China that could provide valuable insights into the past evolution of the EBLF biome.…”