2018
DOI: 10.1128/aem.00706-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylotype-Level Profiling of Lactobacilli in Highly Complex Environments by Means of an Internal Transcribed Spacer-Based Metagenomic Approach

Abstract: The genus is a widespread taxon, members of which are highly relevant to functional and fermented foods, while they are also commonly present in host-associated gut and vaginal microbiota. Substantial efforts have been undertaken to disclose the genetic repertoire of all members of the genus, and yet their species-level profiling in complex matrices is still undeveloped due to the poor phylotype resolution of profiling approaches based on the 16S rRNA gene. To overcome this limitation, an internal transcribed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene‐based microbial profiling generates bacterial taxonomic composition data typically down to the genus level only, while it commonly fails in detecting underrepresented bacterial taxa, thereby causing biases in the interpretation and comparison of data from different studies (Chakravorty et al ., 2007). More recently, the so‐called internal transcribed spacer (ITS) microbial profiling methods were introduced as a tool to offer a more refined taxonomic view of the gut microbiota (Milani et al ., 2014, 2018). The ITS region is located between the 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA genes within the rRNA locus.…”
Section: Overview Of Technical Approaches For Gut Microbiota Charactementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene‐based microbial profiling generates bacterial taxonomic composition data typically down to the genus level only, while it commonly fails in detecting underrepresented bacterial taxa, thereby causing biases in the interpretation and comparison of data from different studies (Chakravorty et al ., 2007). More recently, the so‐called internal transcribed spacer (ITS) microbial profiling methods were introduced as a tool to offer a more refined taxonomic view of the gut microbiota (Milani et al ., 2014, 2018). The ITS region is located between the 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA genes within the rRNA locus.…”
Section: Overview Of Technical Approaches For Gut Microbiota Charactementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because standard 16S rRNA analysis poorly resolves species-level identification of the Lactobacillus genus 26 , we sought alternative approaches to identify the LAB strain(s) responsible for protection in vanc pups. First, we performed oligotyping analysis on all 16S rRNA gene reads assigned to the Lactobacillales order ( Fig.…”
Section: Maternal Antibiotics Alter Communities Of Perinatally Transmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the limitations of 16S rRNA gene microbial profiling and shotgun metagenomics, we present here a pipeline for reliable and cost-effective profiling of microbial communities at the (sub)species level. In detail, we extended the internal transcribed spacer (ITS)-profiling approach described previously for bifidobacteria and lactobacilli ( 10 12 ) to all members of the domain Bacteria . ITS sequences are characterized by higher variability than 16S rRNA genes, thus allowing (sub)species taxonomic resolution when employed for metagenomic profiling purposes ( 10 12 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In detail, we extended the internal transcribed spacer (ITS)-profiling approach described previously for bifidobacteria and lactobacilli ( 10 12 ) to all members of the domain Bacteria . ITS sequences are characterized by higher variability than 16S rRNA genes, thus allowing (sub)species taxonomic resolution when employed for metagenomic profiling purposes ( 10 12 ). Remarkably, the ITS profiling method combines the lower cost and high sensitivity of a marker gene amplification approach with the resolution of shotgun metagenomics ( 7 , 8 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%