2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20816-9_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylter: A System for Modulating Notifications in Wearables Using Physiological Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work has shown that EEG-based BCIs can successfully be used in combination with new technological developments such as AR to improve real-world practicality by offering a richer, more direct, and intuitive interface (Kansaku et al, 2010;Takano et al, 2011;Borges et al, 2016;Faller et al, 2017). However, very few fNIRS applications have explored this option (Afergan et al, 2015;McKendrick et al, 2016;Si-Mohammed et al, 2018;Hu et al, 2019). In the present study, we employed an AR cube to guide the temporal-encoding approach and to display the decoded answer of participants' intentions.…”
Section: Using Ar In Bcis Offers a Great Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent work has shown that EEG-based BCIs can successfully be used in combination with new technological developments such as AR to improve real-world practicality by offering a richer, more direct, and intuitive interface (Kansaku et al, 2010;Takano et al, 2011;Borges et al, 2016;Faller et al, 2017). However, very few fNIRS applications have explored this option (Afergan et al, 2015;McKendrick et al, 2016;Si-Mohammed et al, 2018;Hu et al, 2019). In the present study, we employed an AR cube to guide the temporal-encoding approach and to display the decoded answer of participants' intentions.…”
Section: Using Ar In Bcis Offers a Great Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cortical activity was superimposed onto a participant's head in the real world in real-time through an OST-HMD (HoloLens) device the clinician was wearing. Afergan et al (2015) developed an fNIRSbased BCI using OST-HMD called Phylter. They developed a control system connected to Google Glass that helped preventing the user from getting flooded by notifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In high-consequence settings, physiological-based interventions such as biofeedback often rely on HRV and are associated with improved performance [ 27 ]. Furthermore, the sensitivity of NIRS data affords the opportunity to determine the optimal time to provide notifications or interruptions along the course of a primary task [ 28 ], which has otherwise been shown to increase error, time to completion, annoyance, and anxiety [ 29 ]. This has similarly been demonstrating using HRV data [ 30 ] during real-world cardiac surgeries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, with respect to other functional neuroimaging methods such as fMRI, fNIRS represents an useful tool for neuroergonomics research (for review, see Ayaz et al, 2013 ; Derosière et al, 2013 ), for studies in other fields of neuroscience such as brain-computer interface (for review, see Naseer and Hong, 2015 ), human-robot interaction (for review, see Canning and Scheutz, 2013 ), and cognitive states measurements (for review, see Strait and Scheutz, 2014 ). In addition, very recently the integration of fNIRS with a wearable technology, such as Google Glass, has been demonstrated (Afergan et al, 2015 ). For an adequate understanding of the current findings, some limitations should be pointed out: (1) this study has been conducted in a small sample of healthy young male adults subjects and the subjective cognitive load was not tested by NASA Task Load Index; (2) the duration of the adopted task and the length of the route were relatively short, hence, the effect of a longer duration of the VR HCT on the PFC hemodynamic response remains unknown; (3) this study did not imply a control session for example including/not including motor task with/without VR; (4) this study did not contemplate repeated trials on separate days in order to verify the reproducibility and the potential learning effect of the HCT; (5) the limited number of measurement points (16) made possible by the utilized fNIRS system did not allow the investigation of the supposed connectivity between the PFC and other cortical areas (e.g., premotor and motor cortices) likely involved in performing HCT; and (6) this study did not take into account the impact of the variability of the skull thickness amongst the 16 measurement points within subject and amongst subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%