2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-010-9638-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical activity, body size and composition, and risk of ovarian cancer

Abstract: This study found some evidence for a possible relationship between higher levels of physical activity and body size and increased ovarian cancer risk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, prospective studies have yielded data suggesting a significant positive association between vigorous physical activity and EOC risk (9, 69, 70). While there is biological plausibility for a positive association between excessive vigorous exercise and increased EOC risk by way of impaired immune function (44) and exercise-induced increases in gonadotropin and androgen secretion (70), researchers have cautioned that observations of a direct association between activity and EOC risk could be due to chance (69), small cell sizes (69) and detection bias (10, 69). Importantly, non-differential misclassification of self-reported physical activity parameterized in more than two categories can result in biased estimates away from the null (67).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, prospective studies have yielded data suggesting a significant positive association between vigorous physical activity and EOC risk (9, 69, 70). While there is biological plausibility for a positive association between excessive vigorous exercise and increased EOC risk by way of impaired immune function (44) and exercise-induced increases in gonadotropin and androgen secretion (70), researchers have cautioned that observations of a direct association between activity and EOC risk could be due to chance (69), small cell sizes (69) and detection bias (10, 69). Importantly, non-differential misclassification of self-reported physical activity parameterized in more than two categories can result in biased estimates away from the null (67).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, 29 epidemiological studies have investigated physical activity and OC risk, including fourteen prospective cohort studies 272-285 , two historical cohort studies 286,287 , ten population-based case-control studies 252,288-296 and three hospital-based case-control studies 297-299 . Results are not entirely consistent, but a 2007 meta-analysis estimated a nearly 20% lower risk for the most active women compared to the least active (pooled relative risk=0.81, 95% CI: 0.72–0.92) 292 .…”
Section: Risk Factors and Preventive Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical activity may have a protective role [27]. Other protective factors include higher parity, lactation, combined oral contraceptive use, hysterectomy (with ovarian conservation) and tubal ligation [28][29][30]. The protective nature of pregnancy, breastfeeding, and contraceptive use support the theory of ''incessant ovulation'' which suggests that the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer is increased through the repetitive ovulatory trauma and exposure to estrogen which stimulates epithelial proliferation and malignant transformation [31,32].…”
Section: Gynaecological Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%