Physical Activity, Mental Health and Wellbeing of Adults within and during the Easing of COVID-19 Restrictions, in the United Kingdom and New Zealand

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) participation was substantially reduced at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between PA, mental health, and wellbeing during and following the easing of COVID-19 restrictions in the United Kingdom (UK) and New Zealand (NZ). In this study, 3363 adults completed online surveys within 2–6 weeks of initial COVID-19 restrictions (April/May 2020) and once restrictions to human movement had been eased. Outcome measures included the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short-Form, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-9 (mental health) and World Health Organisation-5 Wellbeing Index. There were no differences in PA, mental health or wellbeing between timepoints (p > 0.05). Individuals engaging in moderate or high volume of PA had significantly better mental health (−1.1 and −1.7 units, respectively) and wellbeing (11.4 and 18.6 units, respectively) than individuals who engaged in low PA (p < 0.001). Mental health was better once COVID-19 restrictions were eased (p < 0.001). NZ had better mental health and wellbeing than the UK (p < 0.001). Participation in moderate-to-high volumes of PA was associated with better mental health and wellbeing, both during and following periods of COVID-19 containment, compared to participation in low volumes of PA. Where applicable, during the current or future pandemic(s), moderate-to-high volumes of PA should be encouraged.

Working from home: Impacts on mental and physical health of Canadian employees during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…First, there could have been a potential for recall bias among the participants when responding to certain questions that required them to recall the last six months or the period prior to the pandemic. Second, mental and physical health outcomes could be affected by seasonal variations [46,47] and pandemic-related restrictions [48][49][50]; therefore, we caution the interpretation of our ndings. Third, our study included respondents who were primarily women, lived in Ontario, worked in non-manager roles, and were employed in large organizations; thus, the study sample may not be representative of the general population.…”

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on household financial asset allocation: A China population study

“…In China, the government has introduced a "dynamic zero" policy (Yang et al, 2022), which is a policy of restricting travel of people and temporarily suspending production of enterprises in a region when an outbreak occurs to stop the spread of the epidemic, resulting in a rapid zero of infected people at the social level. Although these public health measures have been effective in interrupting the spread of the epidemic, they have caused people in many countries around the world to experience restrictions on movement such as centralized or home quarantine, which may have some negative impact on the physical and mental health of the population (Savage et al, 2020;Cheikh Ismail et al, 2021;Faulkner et al, 2022).…”

Australians’ Well-being and Resilience during COVID-19

“…The message received over 700 million views within the first three months (Hunt, 2021). Second, the rates of depression and stress we found during the first year of the pandemic appear comparable with the UK's and higher than New Zealand's, while the rates for anxiety were higher than both countries (Faulkner et al, 2022). Uncertainty during COVID-19 may have been particularly rife in Australia, and manifested as inhibitory anxiety with a significant impact on all of our well-being and resilience outcomes.…”