2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0939-4753(03)80012-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical activity modulates effects of some genetic polymorphisms affecting cardiovascular risk in men aged over 40 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a cross-sectional study, ε4 carriers showed a significant protective effect of high-intensity activity, with athletic ε2, ε3, and ε4 carriers having similar blood lipid profiles and sedentary ε4 carriers showing significantly high levels of lipid risk factors for CAD [69]. A similar result was found in a cross-sectional study of middle-aged highly fit and age-matched sedentary groups, where inactive ε4 carriers had elevated risk factors of CAD, including higher circulating LDL levels compared with physically active ε4 carriers, and compared with ε3 carriers regardless of aerobic activity levels [70]. Thus, physical activity seems to diminish CAD risks in APOE ε4 carriers to ε4 noncarrier levels, whereas sedentary lifestyles may exacerbate CAD risk factors among ε4 carriers.…”
Section: Interaction Between Physical Activity and Apoe Genotypesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In a cross-sectional study, ε4 carriers showed a significant protective effect of high-intensity activity, with athletic ε2, ε3, and ε4 carriers having similar blood lipid profiles and sedentary ε4 carriers showing significantly high levels of lipid risk factors for CAD [69]. A similar result was found in a cross-sectional study of middle-aged highly fit and age-matched sedentary groups, where inactive ε4 carriers had elevated risk factors of CAD, including higher circulating LDL levels compared with physically active ε4 carriers, and compared with ε3 carriers regardless of aerobic activity levels [70]. Thus, physical activity seems to diminish CAD risks in APOE ε4 carriers to ε4 noncarrier levels, whereas sedentary lifestyles may exacerbate CAD risk factors among ε4 carriers.…”
Section: Interaction Between Physical Activity and Apoe Genotypesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Considering the level of aerobic fitness, the probability of elevated LDL cholesterol was only higher among adolescents with adequate aerobic fitness carrying ε4 allele (15% to 48%) when compared to the other groups, and among those carrying ε3 allele (30%) when compared to those carrying ε2 allele (Table 3). These findings seems to indicate that in adolescents the protective effect of ε2 in relation to ε4 depends on adequate aerobic fitness, in agreement with the study of Pisciotta et al (2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, in inactive individuals higher concentrations of this lipoprotein were found among those carrying ε2 allele (Corella et al, 2001). In addition, inactive individuals, but not physically active individuals, carrying ε4 allele were found to have higher LDL concentrations than carriers of the other alleles (Pisciotta et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Sentí et al (54) reported that the HϩHϩ genotype of the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) HindIII polymorphism was only associated with increased serum TG levels in physically inactive men who had a smoking habit. Moreover, it was reported that the TG-raising effect of the ApoA-II-265TT genotype was blunted in high-fitness men (49). However, these studies focused on only a single gene, and the effects of physical activity or CRF on the polygenic effects of blood TG levels have never been examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of SNPs have been shown to attenuate the beneficial effects of exercise on blood lipid profile (22,59). Conversely, several studies showed that a high level of physical activity attenuated the genetic risk for dyslipidemia (49,54). However, these previous studies only focused on a single SNP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%