2023
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00628-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Activity Preferences of People Living with Brain Injury: Formative Qualitative Research to Develop a Discrete Choice Experiment

Abby Haynes,
Kirsten Howard,
Liam Johnson
et al.

Abstract: Background and Objective The World Health Organization physical activity guidelines for people living with disability do not consider the needs of people living with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. This paper describes the qualitative co-development of a discrete choice experiment survey to inform the adaption of these guidelines by identifying the physical activity preferences of people living with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury in Australia. Methods … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value that decision-makers place in DCE findings is in large part dependent on the quality of the instrument design process itself. Numerous quality indicators of DCEs have been discussed in the literature, including validity and reliability [ 5 ], match to research question [ 17 ], patient-centricity [ 18 ], heterogeneity assessment [ 19 ], comprehensibility [ 20 ], and burden [ 21 ]. Developing a DCE that reflects these qualities requires a rigorous design process, which is often achieved through activities such as evidence synthesis, expert consultation, stakeholder engagement, pretesting, and pilot testing [ 15 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value that decision-makers place in DCE findings is in large part dependent on the quality of the instrument design process itself. Numerous quality indicators of DCEs have been discussed in the literature, including validity and reliability [ 5 ], match to research question [ 17 ], patient-centricity [ 18 ], heterogeneity assessment [ 19 ], comprehensibility [ 20 ], and burden [ 21 ]. Developing a DCE that reflects these qualities requires a rigorous design process, which is often achieved through activities such as evidence synthesis, expert consultation, stakeholder engagement, pretesting, and pilot testing [ 15 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%